CVE-2024-40585
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn insertion of sensitive information into log file vulnerabilities [CWE-532] in FortiManager version 7.4.0, version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.8 and below, version 6.4.12 and below, version 6.2.11 and below and FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0, version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.8 and below, version 6.4.12 and below, version 6.2.11 and below eventlog may allow any low privileged user with access to event log section to retrieve certificate private key and encrypted password logged as system log.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiManager and FortiAnalyzer versions prior to the fixed releases log sensitive information (certificate private keys and encrypted passwords) into the system event log. Any user with low-privilege access to the event log section can read this sensitive data, resulting in credential and key disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.2.0, < 7.0.9>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.4= 7.4.0>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.12>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.13>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.9>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.4= 7.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer versionRun 'get system status' or 'fnsysctl get system status' from CLI, or check the web UI under Dashboard > Status to view the firmware versionAffected if Version falls within affected ranges: FortiManager 6.2.0-7.0.8, 7.2.0-7.2.3, or 7.4.0; FortiAnalyzer 6.2.0-6.2.11, 6.4.0-6.4.12, 7.0.0-7.0.8, 7.2.0-7.2.3, or 7.4.0
-
Review recent event logs for sensitive contentNavigate to Log View > Event > System in the web UI or run 'execute log filter category 1' followed by 'execute log display' in CLI to review system event logsAffected if Logs contain certificate private keys, encrypted passwords, or other credential-like strings in plain text within event log entries
-
Check for certificate-related log entriesFilter or search system event logs for keywords such as 'private key', 'certificate', 'pkcs', or look for entries with unusual certificate import/modification eventsAffected if Log entries show private key material or certificate data that should not be recorded in plaintext
-
Verify event log access permissionsCheck user account privileges in FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer under System > Admin > Administrators to confirm if low-privilege users have access to the event log sectionAffected if Users with read-only or limited privileges can access the event log section where sensitive data may be exposed
Your environment is affected if you run a FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer version listed in the affected ranges AND your event logs contain plaintext private keys or encrypted passwords visible to low-privilege users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.126.4.137.0.9
Apply the vendor-supplied patches/updates to FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer to the fixed versions (7.4.1, 7.2.4, 7.0.9, 6.4.13, 6.2.12 or higher). In the interim, restrict and monitor access to the event log section and audit logs for unauthorized access attempts.
FortiManager: 7.0.9, 7.2.4, or 7.4.1+ | FortiAnalyzer: 6.2.12, 6.4.13, 7.0.9, 7.2.4, or 7.4.1+
- 1. Identify current FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer version via Web UI (System > Settings > System Information) or CLI: get system status
- 2. For FortiManager: upgrade to version 7.0.9, 7.2.4, or 7.4.1 or later
- 3. For FortiAnalyzer: upgrade to version 6.2.12, 6.4.13, 7.0.9, 7.2.4, or 7.4.1 or later
- 4. Download firmware from Fortinet Customer Support portal (https://support.fortinet.com)
- 5. Back up current configuration
- 6. Upload and install firmware via Web UI (System > Firmware) or CLI: execute firmware upgrade
- 7. After upgrade, verify the version and confirm the vulnerability is resolved by checking that sensitive data (private keys, passwords) no longer appears in event logs
- 8. Review event log permissions to ensure only authorized administrators have access to event log sections
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-40585 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-40585 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data