Operations Analytics Log AnalysisApplication · Ibm

CVE-2024-40684

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Operations Analytics - Log Analysis 1.3.5.0, 1.3.5.1, 1.3.5.2, 1.3.5.3, 1.3.6.0, 1.3.6.1, 1.3.7.0, 1.3.7.1, 1.3.7.2, and 1.3.8.0, 1.3.8.1, 1.3.8.2, 1.3.8.3, 1.3.8.4 IBM SmartCloud Analytics - Log Analysis does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Operations Analytics - Log Analysis versions 1.3.5.0 through 1.3.8.4 do not enforce strong password requirements by default, allowing attackers to more easily compromise user accounts through brute force, dictionary attacks, or credential guessing due to weak or absent password complexity rules.

MitigationEnable and enforce strong password policies in the IBM product configuration, including minimum length, complexity requirements, password expiration, and account lockout thresholds.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Operations Analytics Log AnalysisApplication
Affected:= 1.3.5.0= 1.3.5.1= 1.3.5.2= 1.3.5.3= 1.3.6.0= 1.3.6.1= 1.3.7.0= 1.3.7.1= 1.3.7.2= 1.3.8.0= 1.3.8.1= 1.3.8.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM Operations Analytics Log Analysis version
    Locate and check the installed version of IBM Operations Analytics - Log Analysis in your environment (typically found in the product's about or version information panel, or via command line query if available)
    Affected if The installed version is 1.3.5.0, 1.3.5.1, 1.3.5.2, 1.3.5.3, 1.3.6.0, 1.3.6.1, 1.3.7.0, 1.3.7.1, 1.3.7.2, 1.3.8.0, 1.3.8.1, or 1.3.8.2
  2. Locate password policy configuration
    Access the IBM Operations Analytics Log Analysis administrative console or configuration files where security and password policies are defined
    Affected if Password policy settings are accessible and can be reviewed
  3. Check password complexity requirements
    Examine the password policy configuration for settings related to minimum password length, character complexity (uppercase, lowercase, numbers, special characters), and whether complexity requirements are enforced
    Affected if Password complexity requirements are disabled, not enforced, or set to weak values such as short minimum length or no character type requirements
  4. Verify default password policy status
    Check whether the product is using default password policy settings rather than custom strong policies
    Affected if The default password policy is in use and has not been modified from factory defaults, or no custom strong password policy has been configured

You are affected if your IBM Operations Analytics Log Analysis version falls within 1.3.5.0 through 1.3.8.2 and the password policy is set to default/weak settings without enforced complexity requirements.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Enable and enforce strong password policies in the IBM product configuration, including minimum length, complexity requirements, password expiration, and account lockout thresholds.

Fix this in Operations Analytics Log Analysis Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-40684 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-40684 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data