CVE-2024-40693
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 could be vulnerable to malicious file upload by not validating the content of the file uploaded to the web interface. Attackers can make use of this weakness and upload malicious executable files into the system, and it can be sent to victim for performing further attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 fail to validate file content during uploads to the web interface, allowing attackers to upload malicious executable files. These files can then be distributed to victims to facilitate further attacks such as malware delivery or remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0= 2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Planning Analytics versionLocate the Planning Analytics installation directory and check the version file or use the IBM PA administration console to view the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is exactly 2.0 or exactly 2.1
-
Locate the web upload configurationAccess the IBM Planning Analytics web configuration files (typically in the conf directory under the web application root) and locate upload-related settings such as upload_MAX_SIZE, upload_ALLOWED_TYPES, or similar parametersAffected if The web upload configuration exists and permits uploads without content-type or magic byte validation settings configured
-
Check for file content validation settingsReview the web application configuration files for any file signature or magic byte validation settings. Look for parameters like file_CONTENT_VALIDATION, VALIDATE_MAGIC_BYTES, or ALLOWLIST_CONFIGAffected if No content validation parameters are found or they are explicitly disabled or missing from the configuration
-
Verify uploaded files directory locationCheck the web server configuration to determine the directory where uploaded files are stored relative to the web rootAffected if Uploaded files are stored within the web-accessible document root or a publicly accessible directory
The environment is affected if IBM Planning Analytics version 2.0 or 2.1 is installed AND the web interface file upload feature is enabled without proper server-side file content validation (magic byte checking or strict allowlists) configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement server-side validation of uploaded file content using magic byte/file signature verification, enforce strict allowlists for permitted file types, sanitize filenames, and store uploads outside web-accessible directories.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-40693 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-40693 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data