CVE-2024-40712
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA path traversal vulnerability allows an attacker with a low-privileged account and local access to the system to perform local privilege escalation (LPE).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in the affected system allows a user with low-level privileges and local system access to manipulate file paths and escape intended directory restrictions, ultimately escalating their privileges to administrator or root level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 12.2.0.334CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Veeam Backup & Replication is installedCheck for Veeam Backup & Replication installation on the system. On Windows, look in Program Files\Veeam or check the Windows Services list for Veeam services. On Linux, check /opt/veeam or systemctl list-unit-files for veeam services.Affected if Veeam Backup & Replication is not installed on the system.
-
Determine the installed version numberOn Windows, open Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Veeam\Veeam Backup & Replication\ or right-click the Veeam icon and select About. On Linux, run 'veeam --version' or check /opt/veeam/veeam/br_info.xml.Affected if Unable to determine the version number.
-
Compare version against affected rangeIf version is found, compare it to the affected range: any version below 12.2.0.334 is vulnerable. Note that version 12.2.0.334 itself or higher is not affected.Affected if Installed version is less than 12.2.0.334.
-
Check for presence of low-privilege user accountsReview user accounts on the system that have local access but limited privileges. On Windows, use 'net user' or Local Users and Groups (lusrmgr.msc). On Linux, check /etc/passwd for non-root users with shell access.Affected if Low-privilege local users exist on the system.
-
Verify file permission configurationsExamine file system permissions on Veeam installation directories and backup storage locations. Check if low-privilege users have write access to directories outside their intended scope. Use icacls (Windows) or ls -la (Linux) on Veeam directories.Affected if Low-privilege users have excessive file system access beyond their designated directories.
A system is affected if Veeam Backup & Replication version is installed and that version is below 12.2.0.334, combined with the presence of low-privilege local users who could potentially exploit the path traversal to escalate privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.2.0.334
Implement strict input validation and canonicalization on all file path parameters, use allow-lists for permitted paths, and ensure proper filesystem permissions are enforced to prevent privilege escalation.
Veeam Backup & Replication 12.2.0.334 or later (12.2.x branch)
- Verify current Veeam Backup & Replication version via Veeam Console or installed programs list
- Download Veeam Backup & Replication version 12.2.0.334 or later from the official Veeam download portal (www.veeam.com)
- Review Veeam's official upgrade guide and release notes for version 12.2.x
- Ensure all critical backups are completed and verified before proceeding
- Stop all Veeam services or follow the recommended maintenance window procedure from Veeam documentation
- Run the installer for version 12.2.0.334 or later with appropriate administrative privileges
- Follow the on-screen upgrade wizard instructions, selecting upgrade/repair option
- Restart the server if prompted by the installer
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-40712 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-40712 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data