CVE-2024-40836
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 16.7.9 and iPadOS 16.7.9, iOS 17.6 and iPadOS 17.6, macOS Sonoma 14.6, watchOS 10.6. A shortcut may be able to use sensitive data with certain actions without prompting the user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA logic flaw in Apple's Shortcuts application allows shortcuts to access sensitive user data (such as contacts, photos, location, or other protected data) without triggering the normal user prompts or authorization requests that should precede such access. This could enable a malicious or misconfigured shortcut to silently exfiltrate sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.7.9>= 17.0, < 17.6< 16.7.9>= 17.0, < 17.6>= 14.0, < 14.6< 10.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check iOS version on iPhoneGo to Settings > General > About and note the version number. Compare it to the affected ranges: < 16.7.9 or >= 17.0 and < 17.6Affected if The iOS version falls within < 16.7.9, >= 17.0 to < 17.6
-
Check iPadOS version on iPadGo to Settings > General > About and note the version number. Compare it to the affected ranges: < 16.7.9 or >= 17.0 and < 17.6Affected if The iPadOS version falls within < 16.7.9, >= 17.0 to < 17.6
-
Check macOS version on MacGo to System Settings > About (or Apple menu > About This Mac) and note the version number. Compare to affected range: >= 14.0 and < 14.6Affected if The macOS version is 14.0 through 14.5.x
-
Check watchOS version on Apple WatchOn iPhone, open the Watch app, go to General > About, and note the watchOS version. Compare to affected range: < 10.6Affected if The watchOS version is below 10.6
-
Identify shortcuts accessing sensitive dataOpen the Shortcuts app and review installed shortcuts. Look for any that use actions accessing contacts, photos, location, health data, or other protected categories without apparent user promptsAffected if Any shortcut accesses protected data categories (contacts, photos, location, etc.) and the OS version is in the affected range listed above
You are affected if your device runs an OS version in the vulnerable range AND you use shortcuts that access sensitive data without explicit authorization prompts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.614.616.7.9
Apply the vendor-supplied patches (iOS 16.7.9/17.6, iPadOS 16.7.9/17.6, macOS Sonoma 14.6, watchOS 10.6) to all affected devices. Review existing shortcuts for suspicious behavior or unexpected data access patterns.
iOS 16.7.9 or iOS 17.6 / iPadOS 16.7.9 or iPadOS 17.6 / macOS Sonoma 14.6 / watchOS 10.6
- For iPhone: Go to Settings > General > Software Update and install iOS 16.7.9 (for older devices) or iOS 17.6 (for supported devices)
- For iPad: Go to Settings > General > Software Update and install iPadOS 16.7.9 (for older devices) or iPadOS 17.6 (for supported devices)
- For Mac: Go to System Settings > General > Software Update and install macOS Sonoma 14.6
- For Apple Watch: On the Watch app on iPhone, go to General > Software Update and install watchOS 10.6
- After updating, verify the installed version matches the security update in Settings > General > About
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-40836 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-40836 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data