CVE-2024-40885
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse after free in the UEFI firmware of some Intel(R) Server M20NTP BIOS may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUse-after-free vulnerability in UEFI firmware of Intel Server M20NTP BIOS. A privileged user with local access could potentially exploit freed memory to escalate privileges. This is a memory safety issue in the firmware layer that could allow arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Intel Server M20NTP system modelRun 'dmidecode -s system-product-name' or check system documentation/labels to verify the hardware is an Intel Server M20NTPAffected if System is NOT an Intel Server M20NTP - the CVE applies specifically to this model
-
Retrieve current BIOS firmware versionRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or access BIOS setup (press F2 during boot) to view the BIOS version stringAffected if Unable to retrieve BIOS version - firmware version cannot be verified
-
Check UEFI/BIOS mode is enabledVerify the system boots in UEFI mode by running 'ls /sys/firmware/efi' or checking boot settings in BIOS setupAffected if System is not using UEFI/BIOS firmware (e.g., legacy BIOS only) - the vulnerability is in the UEFI firmware layer
-
Compare installed BIOS version to fixed versionObtain the Intel-recommended fixed BIOS version from Intel's support site for Server M20NTP and compare it to the version retrieved in step 2Affected if Installed BIOS version is older than the Intel-patched version - system is vulnerable to use-after-free exploitation
A user is affected if they have an Intel Server M20NTP system running a BIOS version older than the Intel-patched version, with UEFI firmware enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Intel BIOS firmware update for the Server M20NTP to the patched version provided by Intel. Ensure proper backup and recovery mechanisms are in place before performing the firmware update.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-40885 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-40885 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data