FilestashApplication

CVE-2024-41256

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.4 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Default configurations in the ShareProofVerifier function of filestash v0.4 causes the application to skip the TLS certificate verification process when sending out email verification codes, possibly allowing attackers to access sensitive data via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The ShareProofVerifier function in filestash v0.4 contains a default configuration that disables TLS certificate verification when sending email verification codes. This allows an attacker positioned on the network path between the mail server and the application to intercept sensitive email content via a man-in-the-middle attack, potentially accessing user verification codes and associated account data.

MitigationEnable and enforce TLS certificate verification in the email configuration for the ShareProofVerifier function, ensuring proper certificate validation is performed when connecting to the mail server.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FilestashApplication
Affected:<= 0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Filestash version
    Run 'filestash --version' or inspect the running container/image tag to determine if the installed version is 0.4 or lower
    Affected if Version is 0.4 or lower (any version up to and including 0.4)
  2. Locate the ShareProofVerifier configuration
    Search configuration files (commonly in /config, /etc/filestash, or the data directory) for settings related to 'shareproof', 'share_proof', or 'verification' functions
    Affected if ShareProofVerifier function is enabled or configured in the environment
  3. Inspect email TLS certificate verification settings
    Open the email or SMTP configuration file and locate settings controlling TLS or certificate verification - look for flags like 'tls_verify', 'ssl_verify', 'insecure', or similar that control certificate validation
    Affected if TLS certificate verification is explicitly disabled (set to false, 0, or insecure mode) or absent/defaults to disabled for the ShareProofVerifier email sending
  4. Verify email sending configuration for ShareProofVerifier
    Check if ShareProofVerifier is configured to send emails and which SMTP/mail server settings it uses - examine whether the configuration inherits or overrides the global email TLS settings
    Affected if ShareProofVerifier sends email verification codes and the TLS certificate verification setting is disabled or not explicitly enforced to true

A user is affected if they run Filestash version 0.4 or lower AND have ShareProofVerifier enabled with email sending, AND the TLS certificate verification is disabled or not explicitly enforced in the configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.4
Interim mitigation

Enable and enforce TLS certificate verification in the email configuration for the ShareProofVerifier function, ensuring proper certificate validation is performed when connecting to the mail server.

Fix this in Filestash Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41256 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41256 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data