CVE-2024-41596
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer Overflow vulnerabilities exist in DrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 (in the Vigor management UI) because of improper retrieval and handling of the CGI form parameters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in DrayTek Vigor310 devices firmware 4.3.2.6 and prior in the Vigor management web interface. The vulnerability stems from improper validation and handling of CGI form parameters passed to the web service, allowing an attacker to overflow buffers via crafted input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions< 4.4.5.3< 4.4.5.2< 4.4.5.3< 4.4.5.2< 4.4.5.3< 4.4.5.3< 4.4.5.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your DrayTek Vigor modelLocate the device label on the router chassis or log into the web management interface and check the status/dashboard page for the model numberAffected if The model is one of: Vigor2620, Vigor2915, Vigor2866, Vigor2766, Vigor2865, Vigor2765, Vigor2763, or Vigor2135
-
Determine the installed firmware versionIn the web management interface, go to System Status or Dashboard to view the firmware version. Alternatively, access the router via CLI and check the firmware version.Affected if The firmware version is below the fixed version for your model: Vigor2915/Vigor2766/Vigor2765/Vigor2763/Vigor2135 < 4.4.5.3, Vigor2866/Vigor2865 < 4.4.5.2, or Vigor2620 (any version)
-
Confirm the web management interface is enabledIn the web interface, go to System Maintenance > Management or System Setup > Access Control and verify HTTP/HTTPS management access is enabledAffected if The web management interface is enabled and accessible (this is the default state)
-
Verify CGI processing is activeThe vulnerability exploits CGI form parameter handling in the web server. This functionality is active by default when the web management interface is enabled.Affected if The web management interface is running - CGI parameter processing is a core function of the Vigor web interface
You are affected if you have a DrayTek Vigor model from the affected list running firmware version lower than the specified threshold for your model, and the web management interface is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.4.5.24.4.5.3
Apply the vendor-supplied firmware patch to upgrade beyond version 4.3.2.6. Until patched, restrict access to the management interface to trusted networks or IP addresses only.
Model-specific firmware: Vigor2915 -> 4.4.5.3 | Vigor2866 -> 4.4.5.2 | Vigor2766 -> 4.4.5.3 | Vigor2865 -> 4.4.5.2 | Vigor2765 -> 4.4.5.3 | Vigor2763 -> 4.4.5.3 | Vigor2135 -> 4.4.5.3 | Vigor2620 -> contact vendor
- 1. Identify the specific DrayTek Vigor model from the affected list (Vigor2620, Vigor2915, Vigor2866, Vigor2766, Vigor2865, Vigor2765, Vigor2763, or Vigor2135)
- 2. Access the Vigor management UI via the device's web interface
- 3. Navigate to the firmware update or system maintenance section
- 4. Download the appropriate firmware version from the DrayTek official support site: for Vigor2915 use 4.4.5.3, for Vigor2866 use 4.4.5.2, for Vigor2766 use 4.4.5.3, for Vigor2865 use 4.4.5.2, for Vigor2765 use 4.4.5.3, for Vigor2763 use 4.4.5.3, for Vigor2135 use 4.4.5.3
- 5. Upload and apply the firmware update via the web interface
- 6. Verify the firmware version has been successfully updated after reboot
- 7. For Vigor2620 (all versions affected with no specified fix), contact DrayTek support for available firmware updates or consider network segmentation as a mitigating control
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41596 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41596 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data