CVE-2024-41732
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft a URL link that could bypass allowlist controls. Depending on the web applications provided by this server, the attacker might inject CSS code or links into the web application that could allow the attacker to read or modify information. There is no impact on availability of application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP contains an allowlist bypass vulnerability where unauthenticated attackers can craft malicious URLs to bypass allowlist controls. This enables injection of CSS code or arbitrary links into web applications, potentially allowing unauthorized read or modification of information. The attack does not impact system availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 755= 756= 757= 758= sap_basis_700= sap_basis_701= sap_basis_702= sap_basis_731= sap_basis_912= sap_ui_754CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed NetWeaver AS ABAP versionExecute transaction code SM51 in the SAP system to view the release and version information of the application server. Alternatively, check the SAP System Information via the SAP Management Console or use transaction code "SAP System" → About to display installed product versions.Affected if The displayed version matches any of the following: 755, 756, 757, or 758.
-
Check SAP Basis component versionExecute transaction code SPAM (Support Package Manager) or use transaction code SM37 to view installed Support Packages. Navigate to the Installed Software component version information, or use transaction code "System" → Status to display the SAP_Basis component version.Affected if The SAP_Basis component version matches any of the following: 700, 701, 702, 731, 912.
-
Verify SAP_UI component versionExecute transaction code SE11 or use transaction code SPAM to view the installed SAP_UI component version. Alternatively, check via transaction code "System" → Status → SAP System Information to locate the SAP_UI version.Affected if The SAP_UI component version is 754.
-
Confirm web application exposureExecute transaction code SICF (Internet Communication Framework) to view active ICF services. Check if HTTP or HTTPS services are active on the SAP system by reviewing the ICF service tree and noting any publicly accessible web application endpoints.Affected if Any ICF services related to web applications (such as BSP applications, Web Dynpro ABAP, or SAP Gateway OData services) are active and accessible via HTTP/HTTPS.
-
Review allowlist configurationExecute transaction code SE80 or navigate to the SAP NetWeaver Administrator. Locate the allowlist configuration for web URL handling, typically found in the security settings or URL filter configuration areas. Inspect the list of allowed URLs and domains.Affected if Allowlist controls are configured and active for web applications, but the system is on an affected version (755-758 or sap_basis/sap_ui versions listed above).
The system is affected if it runs any of the specified versions (755, 756, 757, 758 or sap_basis versions 700-702/731/912 or sap_ui 754) AND has web applications accessible via HTTP/HTTPS with allowlist controls enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply SAP Security Note addressing the allowlist bypass vulnerability in NetWeaver AS ABAP. Review and validate web application URL handling to ensure allowlist controls properly prevent injection of unauthorized CSS or links.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41732 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41732 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data