TeamcityApplication · Jetbrains

CVE-2024-41828

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2024.07 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.07 comparison of authorization tokens took non-constant time

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

TeamCity before version 2024.07 had a timing attack vulnerability in authorization token comparison. The token comparison logic did not use constant-time comparison, meaning the response time varied based on how many characters of the token matched before finding a difference. This could allow attackers to infer valid token values by measuring timing differences.

MitigationUpgrade TeamCity to version 2024.07 or later, which implements constant-time token comparison.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TeamcityApplication
Affected:< 2024.07

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check TeamCity server version
    Log into the TeamCity web interface as an administrator. Navigate to the 'Administration' section and click 'Server Configuration'. The version number is displayed on this page under 'TeamCity Version'. Alternatively, you can check the version by viewing the 'about' page or checking the server startup logs.
    Affected if The displayed version is earlier than 2024.07 (for example, 2024.06, 2024.04, 2023.x, etc.)
  2. Check TeamCity version via command line
    If you have direct access to the TeamCity server, check the version from the command line. Navigate to the TeamCity home directory and look for a version file, or execute: cd <TeamCity_home>/bin and run the version check script if available.
    Affected if The command output or version file shows a version number below 2024.07
  3. Verify authentication token usage
    In the TeamCity web UI under 'Administration' > 'User Management' > 'Tokens', check if any API access tokens have been created. The timing attack vulnerability affects any instance using token-based authentication.
    Affected if The server uses API tokens for authentication and is running a TeamCity version below 2024.07

A TeamCity server is affected by CVE-2024-41828 if it is running any version prior to 2024.07 and uses token-based authentication for API or user access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2024.07 or later
Fixed in 2024.07
Interim mitigation

Upgrade TeamCity to version 2024.07 or later, which implements constant-time token comparison.

Recommended fix High confidence

2024.07

  1. Create a complete backup of your TeamCity installation including the <TeamCity home> directory and database
  2. Stop the TeamCity server
  3. Download TeamCity 2024.07 or later from the official JetBrains website (www.jetbrains.com)
  4. Install the upgrade following JetBrains standard upgrade procedures for your deployment type
  5. Start the TeamCity server
  6. Verify the server is running correctly and all services are operational
  7. Confirm the timing attack vulnerability is remediated by verifying token comparisons now use constant-time comparison
Caveat Review JetBrains release notes for 2024.07 for any configuration or feature changes that may affect your environment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Teamcity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41828 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41828 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data