AnswerApplication · Apache
CVE-2024-41890
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 1.3.5. User sends multiple password reset emails, each containing a valid link. Within the link's validity period, this could potentially lead to the link being misused or hijacked. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.6, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe password reset functionality in Apache Answer allows multiple valid reset tokens to exist simultaneously. When a user requests multiple password reset emails, each token remains valid within its validity period rather than invalidating previous tokens, enabling potential token hijacking or misuse if an attacker gains access to any valid token.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
AnswerApplication
< 1.3.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache Answer installed versionRun `answer version` or check the application metadata to identify the currently installed version numberAffected if The version is lower than 1.3.6 (e.g., 1.3.5, 1.3.0, etc.)
-
Verify password reset feature is enabledCheck the Answer configuration or database settings to confirm the password reset functionality is activeAffected if Password reset is enabled and the version is < 1.3.6
-
Inspect password reset token behaviorRequest multiple password reset emails for the same account and verify whether previous tokens remain valid after a new requestAffected if Multiple valid tokens coexist for the same user within the token validity period
If Apache Answer version is below 1.3.6 and the password reset feature is enabled, the environment is affected by this token reuse vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.6
Upgrade to Apache Answer version 1.3.6 which fixes the issue by ensuring previous password reset tokens are invalidated when a new one is requested.
1.3.6
- Backup the current Apache Answer installation and database
- Download Apache Answer version 1.3.6 from the official Apache Answer release repository
- Stop the currently running Apache Answer service
- Upgrade to version 1.3.6 by following the official upgrade documentation for Apache Answer
- Restart the Apache Answer service
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number and testing password reset functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Answer
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41890 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41890 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data