CVE-2024-4218
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe AffiEasy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.6. This is due to plugin improperly releasing the tagged and patched version of the plugin - the vulnerable version is used as the core files, while the patched version was included in a 'trunk' folder. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform a variety of actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe AffiEasy WordPress plugin up to version 1.1.6 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. The issue stems from an improper release process where the vulnerable version remained as the core plugin files while the patched version was only placed in a 'trunk' folder but not deployed. This allows unauthenticated attackers to forge administrative actions by tricking site admins into clicking malicious links.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the AffiEasy plugin installationCheck your WordPress site's wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'affieasy' or similar. You can also list installed plugins via WP-CLI: wp plugin list --search=affiEasyAffected if The AffiEasy plugin folder exists in the plugins directory
-
Determine the installed versionOpen the main plugin file (usually affieasy.php) in the plugin folder and locate the 'Version:' field in the plugin header comment at the top. Alternatively, check the readme.txt file for the 'Stable tag' entryAffected if The reported version is 1.1.6 or lower
-
Verify the plugin is activeIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and confirm AffiEasy is activated, or use WP-CLI: wp plugin status affieasyAffected if The plugin is installed and currently active on the site
-
Check for CSRF protection in admin actionsReview the plugin's PHP files for admin action handlers (functions hooked to admin_init, admin_post, or similar). Look for presence of wp_verify_nonce(), check_admin_referer(), or wp_nonce_field() calls in functions that perform state-changing operationsAffected if Admin action functions lack nonce verification and are reachable without CSRF tokens
-
Confirm the trunk vs core deployment issueIf accessible via FTP or file manager, check whether a 'trunk' folder exists alongside the main plugin files. The vulnerability exists because the patched version was placed in trunk but not deployed to the main plugin directoryAffected if The plugin directory structure shows a trunk folder with different version files than the deployed core files, or the core files remain at version 1.1.6 or below
Your environment is affected if the AffiEasy WordPress plugin is installed with version 1.1.6 or lower and lacks proper nonce/CSRF token validation on administrative actions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the properly patched version of the AffiEasy plugin once available, and implement WordPress nonces/CSRF tokens for admin actions to prevent forged request attacks.
Latest version of AffiEasy plugin (beyond 1.1.6)
- 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate the AffiEasy plugin in the list
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version
- 5. After updating, verify the plugin version is newer than 1.1.6
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4218 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4218 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data