CVE-2024-42330
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe HttpRequest object allows to get the HTTP headers from the server's response after sending the request. The problem is that the returned strings are created directly from the data returned by the server and are not correctly encoded for JavaScript. This allows to create internal strings that can be used to access hidden properties of objects.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe HttpRequest object returns HTTP response headers as strings without proper JavaScript encoding. Since these strings are created directly from server-supplied data, an attacker can craft malicious header values containing special characters or escape sequences that enable access to hidden object properties, potentially leading to prototype pollution or data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.0.0, < 5.4.6>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.34>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.19>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Zabbix versionRun 'zabbix_server --version' or 'zabbix_proxy --version' on the server, or check the Zabbix web interface footer for the version numberAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 5.0.0 to 5.4.5, 6.0.0 to 6.0.33, 6.4.0 to 6.4.18, or 7.0.0 to 7.0.3
-
Locate HTTP agent items or web scenariosIn Zabbix web UI, go to Configuration > Hosts > Items and filter for type 'HTTP agent', or check Configuration > Web scenarios for any monitored HTTP servicesAffected if Any HTTP agent items or web scenarios exist that retrieve external HTTP responses
-
Identify items using JavaScript preprocessing with header accessReview item preprocessing configurations for any JavaScript steps that access response headers, such as 'JSONPath' with header data or custom JavaScript that calls HttpRequest() and processes headersAffected if JavaScript preprocessing is used to process HTTP response headers from HttpRequest calls
-
Check for userparameter scripts or external script integrationsReview /etc/zabbix/zabbix_server.conf for 'ExternalScripts' directory and examine any custom scripts in that directory that may use the Zabbix JavaScript API to make HTTP requestsAffected if Custom external scripts or userparameters leverage the HttpRequest functionality to fetch and process HTTP headers
You are affected if your Zabbix version is within the affected ranges AND you use HTTP agent items, web scenarios, or custom JavaScript preprocessing that processes HTTP response headers via HttpRequest.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.4.66.0.346.4.19
Implement proper JavaScript encoding/escaping of all string values returned from HttpRequest headers before using them in object property access or string operations. Validate and sanitize header content at the application boundary.
Upgrade to Zabbix 5.4.6, 6.0.34, 6.4.19, or 7.0.4 (or later) depending on your current major version branch
- Backup your current Zabbix database and configuration files
- Plan a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Review Zabbix upgrade documentation for your current version at https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/
- Stop Zabbix server and frontend services
- Upgrade Zabbix packages using your package manager (e.g., yum update zabbix-server-mysql, apt get upgrade zabbix-server-mysql)
- Or download and install from https://www.zabbix.com/download_sources
- Start Zabbix server and verify all services are running
- Clear browser cache and test the web frontend
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation10.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,432.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-42330 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-42330 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data