CVE-2024-42427
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell ThinOS versions 2402 and 2405, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDell ThinOS versions 2402 and 2405 contain a command injection vulnerability where special elements are not properly neutralized before being used in system commands. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the thin client device can inject arbitrary commands, potentially achieving elevation of privileges to execute code with higher system permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.5.1079= 9.5.2109CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ThinOS version and build numberAccess the ThinOS system information panel via the device UI, or use the CLI command 'version' or 'systeminfo' to retrieve the installed OS version and build number (for ThinOS 2402 or 2405)Affected if The build number matches 9.5.1079 or 9.5.2109 exactly (these are the vulnerable builds)
-
Confirm ThinOS release lineVerify the ThinOS release is either 2402 or 2405 by checking the system properties or boot logsAffected if The device runs ThinOS 2402 or 2405 and contains either of the vulnerable build numbers
-
Check for exposed management interfacesReview network configuration to determine if the device has open management ports or services accessible that could be reached with physical keyboard/mouse access (such as VNC, RDP, or local console)Affected if Unauthenticated local interfaces are accessible without additional authentication controls
-
Inspect system command execution pointsExamine the device configuration for any custom scripts, scheduled tasks, or system utilities that accept user-supplied input and execute system commandsAffected if Any feature or configuration allows arbitrary command input without input validation sanitization
The device is affected if it runs ThinOS 2402 or 2405 with build number 9.5.1079 or 9.5.2109, and has exposed interfaces or features accessible to an attacker with physical access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches for ThinOS 2402 and 2405 when available, and implement physical access controls on affected thin client devices to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-42427 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-42427 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data