Code InjectionWeakness · CWE-94

CVE-2024-42448

CRITICAL · 9.9 CVSS v3.0 Published 2024-12-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
From the VSPC management agent machine, under condition that the management agent is authorized on the server, it is possible to perform Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the VSPC server machine.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a critical RCE vulnerability in Veeam Service Provider Console (VSPC). An attacker who has compromised or controls a VSPC management agent that is authorized on the VSPC server can execute arbitrary code on the VSPC server machine. This represents a lateral movement threat where a compromised management agent can pivot to the central management server.

MitigationApply the vendor patch for CVE-2024-42448 to the VSPC server and all management agents. Review and revoke any unauthorized or suspicious management agent authorizations on the VSPC server.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify VSPC installation and version
    On the VSPC server, open Programs and Features or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | DisplayName, Version' to find Veeam Service Provider Console and note the installed version number.
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than the patched version released by Veeam for CVE-2024-42448.
  2. Locate the VSPC server configuration file
    Navigate to the VSPC installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Veeam\Service Provider Console\) and locate the version or license file that displays the exact build number.
    Affected if The build number matches a version known to be vulnerable to this CVE.
  3. Review authorized management agents
    In the VSPC web interface, go to Management Agents section and export or document the list of all authorized management agents, noting their names, IP addresses, and last connection times.
    Affected if There are management agents present that are unrecognized, have suspicious names, or show unexpected connection patterns.
  4. Check for unauthorized or duplicate agent authorizations
    In VSPC, navigate to Infrastructure > Management Agents and look for any agents with duplicate fingerprints, unknown enterprise IDs, or agents added outside normal business hours.
    Affected if Any management agent authorization exists that was not explicitly created by an administrator.
  5. Audit VSPC server for suspicious processes or network connections
    On the VSPC server, run netstat -ano to list established connections and Task Manager or Get-Process to identify unexpected processes running under the VSPC service account.
    Affected if Unexpected processes or outbound connections to unknown destinations are observed.

A system is affected if VSPC is installed with a version prior to the vendor patch AND has at least one authorized management agent that could serve as a lateral movement vector.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch for CVE-2024-42448 to the VSPC server and all management agents. Review and revoke any unauthorized or suspicious management agent authorizations on the VSPC server.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-42448 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-42448 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data