Incorrect Permission AssignmentWeakness · CWE-732

CVE-2024-42449

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2024-12-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
From the VSPC management agent machine, under condition that the management agent is authorized on the server, it is possible to remove arbitrary files on the VSPC server machine.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an arbitrary file deletion vulnerability in Veeam Service Provider Console (VSPC). A management agent that is authorized on the VSPC server can remove arbitrary files on the server machine, likely due to missing path traversal checks or improper authorization validation in the file deletion functionality.

MitigationRestrict management agent permissions to only authorized operations, implement strict path validation and authorization checks before file deletions, and apply vendor patches when available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Veeam Service Provider Console is installed
    Locate the VSPC installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Veeam\Service Provider Console or /opt/veeam/vspc) and verify the VSPC server components are present
    Affected if VSPC server components are found on the system
  2. Identify the installed VSPC version
    Check the version of VSPC by inspecting the product information in the installation directory, typically found in an About section or version file, or run 'vspc --version' if the command-line tool is available
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within the affected version range (if known); if versions are unknown, the system may still be affected
  3. Verify management agents are authorized and connected
    Check the VSPC management console or configuration files for authorized management agents. Look for agent entries in the VSPC database or configuration repository
    Affected if One or more management agents are authorized and connected to the VSPC server, enabling the attack surface for this vulnerability
  4. Check if file deletion functionality is accessible to management agents
    Examine the VSPC server configuration and API endpoints that handle file deletion operations. Review agent permission settings in the VSPC administrative interface
    Affected if Management agents have permissions to perform file operations or the file deletion API endpoints are exposed without proper path validation
  5. Inspect path validation in file deletion configurations
    Review VSPC configuration files and logs for file deletion requests. Check if path traversal sequences (..\) are being validated or filtered before file operations
    Affected if Path traversal checks are missing or insufficient in the file deletion logic, allowing arbitrary file paths to be specified

A system is affected if VSPC is installed with authorized management agents and the file deletion functionality lacks proper path traversal or authorization validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict management agent permissions to only authorized operations, implement strict path validation and authorization checks before file deletions, and apply vendor patches when available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-42449 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-42449 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data