Upkeeper ManagerApplication · Upkeeper

CVE-2024-42463

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.1.10 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in upKeeper Solutions product upKeeper Manager allows Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive Data.This issue affects upKeeper Manager: through 5.1.9.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An authorization bypass vulnerability in upKeeper Manager's REST API allows attackers to access sensitive data by manipulating user-controlled keys used in resource requests. The vulnerability stems from the system trusting user input for authorization decisions without proper validation.

MitigationUpgrade to a version beyond 5.1.9. If upgrade is not immediately possible, implement strict validation of user-supplied keys in REST API requests and enforce proper authorization checks at each endpoint.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Upkeeper ManagerApplication
Affected:< 5.1.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify upKeeper Manager version
    Locate the installed version through the product's administrative console, about panel, or by querying the service's version endpoint (commonly found in /api/status, /api/version, or the management UI system information page)
    Affected if The installed version is below 5.1.10
  2. Confirm REST API is enabled
    Verify that the REST API service is running and accessible by checking the API endpoint availability (typically at /api/ or /api/v1/ paths) through the management interface or network configuration
    Affected if The REST API is exposed and operational in the environment
  3. Examine API authorization logic
    Review the API configuration or audit logs to determine whether user-supplied keys in resource requests are being validated against proper authorization boundaries before granting access
    Affected if The system relies on user-controlled keys without validating their authorization rights

If the installed version is below 5.1.10 and the REST API is accessible without additional hardening, the environment is likely affected by this authorization bypass vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.1.10 or later
Fixed in 5.1.10
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a version beyond 5.1.9. If upgrade is not immediately possible, implement strict validation of user-supplied keys in REST API requests and enforce proper authorization checks at each endpoint.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

5.1.10

  1. Identify the current version of upKeeper Manager deployed in your environment
  2. Review the release notes and security advisories on support.upkeeper.se for version 5.1.10 to understand changes
  3. Perform a complete backup of the current upKeeper Manager installation and configuration
  4. Follow the vendor's documented upgrade procedure to update to version 5.1.10 or later
  5. After upgrading, verify that the IDOR vulnerability is resolved by testing authorization controls on REST API endpoints
  6. Confirm that normal upKeeper Manager functionality remains intact after the upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Upkeeper Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-42463 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-42463 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data