Uncontrolled Search Path (DLL Hijack)Weakness · CWE-427

CVE-2024-42492

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Uncontrolled search path element in some BIOS and System Firmware Update Package for Intel(R) Server M50FCP family before version R01.02.0002 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability in Intel Server M50FCP family BIOS and System Firmware Update Package. The vulnerability allows a privileged local user to potentially escalate privileges by exploiting how the firmware update process searches for and loads executable components from untrusted locations.

MitigationApply Intel firmware update R01.02.0002 or later to the affected Intel Server M50FCP family systems. This is a vendor-supplied patch that addresses the uncontrolled search path vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify system model
    Run command 'dmidecode -s system-product-name' or check system BIOS information screen to verify the hardware is Intel Server M50FCP family
    Affected if The system product name does not contain 'M50FCP' - not affected
  2. Check BIOS firmware version
    Run command 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or access BIOS setup to view the current BIOS firmware version
    Affected if Unable to retrieve BIOS version - cannot determine status
  3. Check System Firmware version
    Run command 'dmidecode -s firmware-version' or use Intel System Firmware Update utility if available to view System Firmware version
    Affected if Unable to retrieve System Firmware version - cannot determine status
  4. Compare versions to fixed release
    Compare the installed BIOS and System Firmware version numbers against the fixed version R01.02.0002. Earlier versions (e.g., R01.01.xxxx, R01.00.xxxx) are considered vulnerable
    Affected if Installed version is numerically lower than R01.02.0002 - system is affected by this vulnerability

A user is affected if they own an Intel Server M50FCP system with BIOS or System Firmware version earlier than R01.02.0002, as the uncontrolled search path flaw exists in the firmware update process of those versions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Intel firmware update R01.02.0002 or later to the affected Intel Server M50FCP family systems. This is a vendor-supplied patch that addresses the uncontrolled search path vulnerability.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

R01.02.0002

  1. Download the BIOS/System Firmware Update Package version R01.02.0002 for Intel(R) Server M50FCP family from Intel's official support website
  2. Verify the integrity of the downloaded update package using checksums if provided
  3. Apply the firmware update following Intel's standard BIOS/firmware update procedures for the Server M50FCP family
  4. Reboot the system as required by the firmware update process to complete the installation
  5. Confirm the installed firmware version is R01.02.0002 or later after the update
Caveat Firmware updates carry inherent risks and should be tested in a non-production environment before deployment; ensure backup of current configuration and have a recovery plan

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,180
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-42492 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-42492 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data