Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2024-42505

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-09-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Command injection vulnerabilities in the underlying CLI service could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's Access Point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Command injection vulnerabilities in Aruba's PAPI (Access Point management protocol) CLI service allow unauthenticated attackers to achieve remote code execution as privileged users by sending specially crafted UDP packets to port 8211.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches immediately; if patching is delayed, restrict or block untrusted network access to UDP port 8211.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify UDP port 8211 is exposed
    Scan the device or network for open UDP port 8211 (e.g., nmap -sU -p 8211 <target>). Check local listening status with 'netstat -anup | grep 8211' or 'ss -ulnp | grep 8211' on the Aruba device if CLI access is available.
    Affected if UDP port 8211 is open and reachable from untrusted networks
  2. Identify the Aruba device model
    Log into the device CLI or web UI and retrieve the hardware model (e.g., 'show version' command or system info page). Common product lines include Aruba Instant, ArubaOS, Aruba CX switches, or Mobility Controllers.
    Affected if The device is an Aruba product that implements the PAPI protocol
  3. Retrieve the installed firmware version
    Execute 'show version' in the device CLI or check the web UI for the firmware/OS version. Record the full version string (e.g., ArubaOS version X.Y.Z).
    Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or is older than the patched release
  4. Check PAPI CLI service status
    On supported devices, verify if the PAPI service is enabled. In ArubaOS, this may be visible in 'show running-config' or via 'show process' commands. The vulnerability applies when PAPI (port 8211/UDP) is actively listening.
    Affected if The PAPI service is running and listening on UDP port 8211
  5. Compare version against vendor advisory
    Locate the Aruba security advisory for CVE-2024-42505 (typically posted on arubanetworks.com/support-services/security-bulletins). Match your firmware version from step 3 against the affected version ranges listed in the advisory.
    Affected if Your firmware version falls within the affected (unpatched) range and the PAPI service is active

You are affected if an Aruba device has UDP port 8211 open, the PAPI CLI service is enabled, and the firmware version is within the unpatched range specified in the Aruba security advisory for CVE-2024-42505.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches immediately; if patching is delayed, restrict or block untrusted network access to UDP port 8211.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-42505 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-42505 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data