CVE-2024-4310
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HubBank affecting version 1.0.2. This vulnerability allows an attacker to send a specially crafted JavaScript payload to registration and profile forms and trigger the payload when any authenticated user loads the page, resulting in a session takeover.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HubBank version 1.0.2 allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript payloads through registration and profile forms. When authenticated users view pages containing the injected payload, it executes in their browser context, enabling session takeover.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify HubBank installation and versionLocate the HubBank application files or check the application's version information. Look for version number '1.0.2' in the source code, configuration files, or the application's about/admin page.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.2.
-
Verify registration functionality is enabledCheck if the user registration feature is active on the HubBank login page or main portal. Look for a 'Register' or 'Sign Up' link or form.Affected if User registration is accessible and enabled on the application.
-
Check for stored XSS payloads in the databaseInspect the user database tables (likely 'users' or similar) for any JavaScript tags, script elements, or encoded XSS vectors in fields such as username, full name, email, or other profile-related columns.Affected if Database contains suspicious script tags or JavaScript code in user-input fields.
-
Examine profile form handlingAccess the user profile creation and edit forms through the web interface. Submit a test payload containing a benign XSS probe like '<script>alert(1)</script>' or '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>' to see if it is stored and reflected back without sanitization.Affected if The profile form accepts and stores the XSS payload without encoding or sanitization, and it executes when the profile is viewed.
You are affected if HubBank version 1.0.2 is running with registration or profile forms enabled, and those forms do not sanitize user input before storing it in the database.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in registration and profile forms. Consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) as an additional layer of defense until the vendor patch is applied.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4310 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4310 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data