CVE-2024-43176
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM OpenPages 9.0 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information such as configurations that should only be available to privileged users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM OpenPages 9.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where an authenticated (non-privileged) user can access sensitive configuration data that should be restricted to privileged users only. This represents an authorization bypass allowing privilege escalation through normal application functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenPages installation and versionLocate the IBM OpenPages installation directory and check for version files or use the OpenPages administrative console to view system informationAffected if Installed version is exactly 9.0 (9.0.0)
-
Verify user authentication statusConfirm the user account being tested is authenticated to the OpenPages system but does not hold privileged roles such as Administrator or GRC AdministratorAffected if User is authenticated with a non-privileged role (e.g., standard user, analyst)
-
Check for access to sensitive configuration dataAttempt to access or query configuration-related endpoints, settings, or data areas within OpenPages that typically require elevated privileges (e.g., system configuration, security settings, integration credentials)Affected if A non-privileged authenticated user can retrieve configuration data that should be restricted to privileged users only
-
Review user role assignmentsUse the OpenPages Administration UI or database query to enumerate all role assignments and identify which users hold privileged versus non-privileged rolesAffected if Non-privileged users exist in the system and can potentially access restricted configuration areas
Your environment is affected if IBM OpenPages version 9.0 is installed AND a non-privileged authenticated user can access sensitive configuration data that should be restricted to privileged roles only.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM's patch when available. Until then, audit user role assignments to ensure only necessary personnel have privileged access, and monitor access logs for anomalous configuration retrieval by non-privileged accounts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,440.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43176 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43176 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data