CVE-2024-43204
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSSRF in Apache HTTP Server with mod_proxy loaded allows an attacker to send outbound proxy requests to a URL controlled by the attacker. Requires an unlikely configuration where mod_headers is configured to modify the Content-Type request or response header with a value provided in the HTTP request. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.64 which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server where mod_proxy is loaded and mod_headers is configured in an unlikely manner to modify the Content-Type request or response header using a value taken directly from the HTTP request. This allows an attacker to cause the server to send outbound proxy requests to arbitrary URLs they control.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.64CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache HTTP Server versionRun 'httpd -v' or 'apache2 -v' to get the installed version numberAffected if Version is 2.4.0 or higher but lower than 2.4.64
-
Verify mod_proxy is loadedRun 'httpd -M' or 'apache2ctl -M' and look for 'proxy_module' in the output, or check for 'LoadModule proxy_module' in the httpd.conf configuration filesAffected if mod_proxy is loaded and enabled
-
Verify mod_headers is loadedRun 'httpd -M' or 'apache2ctl -M' and look for 'headers_module' in the output, or check for 'LoadModule headers_module' in the httpd.conf configuration filesAffected if mod_headers is loaded and enabled
-
Inspect mod_headers configuration for Content-Type manipulationSearch all configuration files (httpd.conf, include files, .conf files in conf.d or conf.modules.d) for any 'Header set Content-Type' or 'Header always set Content-Type' directivesAffected if A directive modifies the Content-Type header
-
Check if Content-Type uses request-supplied inputExamine any Content-Type header directive found and determine if it uses variables that pull from the incoming HTTP request, such as %{HTTP_Content-Type}, %{CONTENT_TYPE}, or similar expressions that directly echo back user inputAffected if The Content-Type header modification uses a value taken directly from the HTTP request (e.g., %{HTTP_Content-Type})
You are affected if you are running Apache 2.4.0 to 2.4.63 with mod_proxy and mod_headers loaded, and you have a mod_headers configuration that echoes back the request's Content-Type header value to modify outbound requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.64
Upgrade Apache HTTP Server to version 2.4.64 and audit the mod_headers configuration to ensure it is not using user-supplied input to modify Content-Type headers, which is an unusual and dangerous configuration.
2.4.64
- Check current Apache HTTP Server version (e.g., httpd -v or apache2 -v)
- Download Apache HTTP Server version 2.4.64 from the official Apache distribution site (httpd.apache.org) or use your system's package manager
- Install the new version following standard upgrade procedures for your operating system
- Restart the Apache HTTP Server service (e.g., systemctl restart httpd or systemctl restart apache2)
- Verify the installed version is 2.4.64 (httpd -v)
- Ensure mod_headers and mod_proxy configurations are still functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43204 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data