Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2024-43212

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in MagePeople Team WpTravelly allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects WpTravelly: from n/a through 1.7.7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in the WpTravelly WordPress plugin allows unauthenticated or lower-privileged users to access functionality that should be restricted by Access Control Lists (ACLs). This Broken Access Control (CWE-862) flaw enables attackers to perform actions outside their intended permissions.

MitigationImplement proper capability checks, nonce verification, and role-based access control validation on all sensitive functions. Upgrade to the latest version of WpTravelly when available, or manually add authorization checks to the affected endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WpTravelly plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and confirm WpTravelly is listed and active, or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the wptravelly folder
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active on the WordPress site
  2. Determine installed WpTravelly version
    In WordPress admin > Plugins, click on WpTravelly to view the version number, or read the main plugin file header in /wp-content/plugins/wptravelly/includes/plugin.php
    Affected if The installed version lacks the authorization fix (compare against the version that addresses CVE-2024-43212)
  3. Inspect plugin endpoints for authorization logic
    Examine the plugin PHP files in /wp-content/plugins/wptravelly/ for functions handling sensitive operations (e.g., booking management, user data access) and verify they include current_user_can() capability checks or nonce verification before executing
    Affected if Sensitive functions lack current_user_can() checks or nonce validation on the affected endpoints
  4. Test for unauthorized access to restricted features
    Using a low-privileged user account or unauthenticated request, attempt to access plugin functions that should require admin or elevated privileges (e.g., modifying bookings, accessing user data). Use browser dev tools or a tool like curl to send requests directly to suspected endpoints.
    Affected if Requests from unauthenticated or low-privilege users successfully access or modify data that should be restricted

A site is affected if WpTravelly is installed, the version is prior to the patched release, and sensitive plugin functions can be accessed without proper capability checks or authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper capability checks, nonce verification, and role-based access control validation on all sensitive functions. Upgrade to the latest version of WpTravelly when available, or manually add authorization checks to the affected endpoints.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43212 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43212 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data