Smart Online Order For CloverWordPress extension · Zaytech
CVE-2024-43253
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in ZAYTECH Smart Online Order for Clover clover-online-orders.This issue affects Smart Online Order for Clover: from n/a through <= 1.5.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Missing Authorization vulnerability in ZAYTECH's Smart Online Order for Clover plugin (versions up to 1.5.6). The flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive functionality or data without proper authorization checks, likely exposing order management, customer data, or administrative features of the Clover POS integration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Smart Online Order For CloverWordPress extension
< 1.5.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of ZAYTECH Smart Online Order For CloverAccess the Clover admin interface or check the plugin/app manifest file to locate the version number. In most Clover integrations, you can find this in the apps section under 'Installed Apps' or within the application configuration panel.Affected if The version listed is 1.5.6 or lower (any version through 1.5.6 is affected)
-
Verify if the application exposes admin or management endpoints publiclyReview the application configuration or web server settings to determine which endpoints are accessible without authentication. Check the application's routing configuration or API endpoint definitions for any sensitive paths related to orders, customers, or settings.Affected if Sensitive endpoints such as admin panels, order management, or customer data APIs are accessible without authentication or authorization headers
-
Check for role-based access control configurationLocate the application's access control settings within the Clover admin or the plugin configuration. Look for any authorization, permission, or role-based access settings that govern who can access sensitive operations.Affected if No role-based access control is defined or enforced on sensitive operations, or authorization checks are missing entirely
-
Review server or application logs for unauthorized access patternsExamine access logs from the web server or application for repeated requests to sensitive endpoints originating from unauthenticated IP addresses or without valid authentication tokens.Affected if Logs show successful or attempted access to sensitive functionality from unauthenticated sources
You are affected if the installed version is 1.5.6 or lower AND the application exposes any sensitive endpoints or operations without requiring authentication or authorization validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.5.7
Upgrade to a patched version if available; otherwise, implement proper role-based authorization checks on all endpoints and validate user permissions before executing sensitive operations.
1.5.7
- 1. Backup your WordPress site and database before performing any updates
- 2. Update the Smart Online Order For Clover plugin to version 1.5.7 through the WordPress admin dashboard ( navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins > Smart Online Order For Clover > Update now ), or download the latest version from the WordPress plugin repository and upload via FTP
- 3. Verify the update was successful by checking the plugin version in the WordPress admin under Plugins
- 4. Test critical order and menu functionality to ensure the update did not introduce any issues
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Smart Online Order For Clover
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43253 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data