dbcve.org
Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2024-43256

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in nouthemes Leopard - WordPress offload media allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Leopard - WordPress offload media: from n/a through 2.0.36.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization vulnerability in the Leopard WordPress offload media plugin allows attackers to access functionality that is not properly constrained by access control lists. This enables unauthorized users to potentially perform actions that should require higher privileges.

MitigationUpgrade to version 2.0.37 or later which contains proper authorization controls, or add capability checks and ACL validation to sensitive functions within the plugin.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the Leopard offload media plugin
    In the WordPress installation, navigate to wp-content/plugins/ and look for a folder named 'leopard' or 'leopard-offload-media'. Alternatively, go to WP Admin > Plugins and check if a plugin with 'Leopard' in the name is listed.
    Affected if The plugin is installed regardless of version, though only versions before 2.0.37 are affected by this CVE.
  2. Find the installed plugin version
    Open the plugin's main PHP file (usually named leopard.php or index.php) and look for the version header in the plugin comment block at the top. Alternatively, check the readme.txt file in the plugin folder for the 'Stable tag' or 'Version' entry.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.0.37.
  3. Confirm the plugin is active
    In WP Admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and verify whether the Leopard offload media plugin shows as 'Active'.
    Affected if The plugin is active and the version is below 2.0.37, indicating exposure to the authorization bypass.

The environment is affected if the Leopard WordPress offload media plugin is active and the installed version is lower than 2.0.37, as this version lacks proper capability checks and ACL validation on sensitive functions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to version 2.0.37 or later which contains proper authorization controls, or add capability checks and ACL validation to sensitive functions within the plugin.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43256 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43256 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data