CVE-2024-43383
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Lucene.Net.Replicator. This issue affects Apache Lucene.NET's Replicator library: from 4.8.0-beta00005 through 4.8.0-beta00016. An attacker that can intercept traffic between a replication client and server, or control the target replication node URL, can provide a specially-crafted JSON response that is deserialized as an attacker-provided exception type. This can result in remote code execution or other potential unauthorized access. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.8.0-beta00017, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Lucene.NET Replicator deserializes JSON responses without validating the exception type, allowing an attacker who controls the replication node URL or performs a man-in-the-middle attack to specify a malicious exception type for deserialization, leading to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Lucene.NET installationLocate the Lucene.NET assembly or NuGet package in your application dependencies, build output, or deployed binaries. Check your project file (e.g., .csproj), packages.config, or the bin directory for Lucene.Net.dll.Affected if Lucene.NET libraries are present in your environment
-
Verify the exact version of Lucene.NETCheck the version of the Lucene.Net.dll assembly (right-click > Properties > File Version) or the NuGet package version in your dependency manager. Compare the installed version to the affected range.Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.8.0
-
Determine if Replicator component is in useSearch your codebase, configuration files, and deployment artifacts for usage of Lucene.Net.Replicator namespace, classes such as Replicator, ReplicationClient, or related replication handlers. Check if your application configures or instantiates any Replicator-related objects.Affected if Your application uses or configures the Lucene.NET Replicator component
-
Check replication endpoint configurationInspect your application configuration files, connection strings, or replication settings for any configured replication node URLs or replication service endpoints.Affected if Replication node URLs are configured and reachable from your application
-
Inspect network traffic protection for replicationExamine your replication configuration or network settings to determine if TLS/SSL encryption is enforced for replication communication channels.Affected if Replication traffic does NOT use TLS encryption and the replication node URL is accessible to attackers
Your environment is affected if you have Apache Lucene.NET version 4.8.0 with the Replicator component enabled and replication traffic is unencrypted or the node URL is attacker-controllable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache Lucene.NET Replicator version 4.8.0-beta00017 or later. Ensure TLS is enforced for all replication traffic to prevent interception.
4.8.0-beta00017
- Check your project's current Apache Lucene.Net version in your .csproj file or packages.config
- Update the Lucene.Net package reference to version 4.8.0-beta00017 or later using NuGet package manager or by modifying the version number in your project file
- Run a NuGet restore to fetch the updated package
- Rebuild your solution to ensure compatibility with the new version
- Test your application's replication functionality to verify the upgrade works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43383 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43383 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data