CVE-2024-43394
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via mod_rewrite or apache expressions that pass unvalidated request input. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.63. Note: The Apache HTTP Server Project will be setting a higher bar for accepting vulnerability reports regarding SSRF via UNC paths. The server offers limited protection against administrators directing the server to open UNC paths. Windows servers should limit the hosts they will connect over via SMB based on the nature of NTLM authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSSRF vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows attackers to leak NTLM hashes to malicious servers via mod_rewrite or Apache expressions that pass unvalidated user input to UNC paths. This enables remote attackers to capture Windows authentication credentials by tricking the server into connecting to attacker-controlled SMB resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.64CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache HTTP Server versionRun 'httpd -v' or 'apachectl -v' from the Apache bin directory, or inspect the ServerTokens/Server header in HTTP responsesAffected if Version is 2.4.0 through 2.4.63 inclusive (any version >= 2.4.0 and < 2.4.64)
-
Verify Windows platformConfirm the Apache server is running on a Windows host (check OS via 'systeminfo' or 'winver')Affected if The server is running on Windows; this vulnerability does not affect non-Windows systems
-
Inspect mod_rewrite rules for UNC path handlingReview httpd.conf and included configuration files for RewriteRule directives that incorporate user-supplied input (such as %{QUERY_STRING}, %{HTTP_HOST}, or request URI segments) into paths that could become UNC paths (paths starting with \\ or referencing SMB shares)Affected if mod_rewrite rules exist that pass unvalidated user input to UNC-style paths without proper validation
-
Check Apache expressions for SSRF vectorsSearch configuration files for expressions (using 'expr' in RewriteCond or other directives) that construct file or request paths from user input and could be directed to remote SMB resourcesAffected if Expressions in the configuration use raw user input to build paths without validation that prevents UNC path construction
You are affected if Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 through 2.4.63 are running on Windows with mod_rewrite or Apache expressions that allow unvalidated user input to be used in UNC path contexts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.64
Update Apache HTTP Server to the patched version and restrict UNC path access on Windows servers by limiting SMB connections to trusted hosts. Review mod_rewrite rules and Apache expressions for unvalidated input being used in request handling.
2.4.64
- 1. Back up your current Apache HTTP Server configuration files (httpd.conf and any included files) and document your current setup
- 2. Stop the Apache HTTP Server service
- 3. Download Apache HTTP Server version 2.4.64 from the official Apache download page (httpd.apache.org) or your distribution's package repository
- 4. Verify the integrity of the downloaded package using published checksums
- 5. Replace the existing Apache installation files with the new version 2.4.64
- 6. Restore your backed-up configuration files
- 7. Review and test your configuration syntax using 'httpd -t'
- 8. Start the Apache HTTP Server service
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43394 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43394 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data