CVE-2024-43401
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedXWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. A user without script/programming right can trick a user with elevated rights to edit a content with a malicious payload using a WYSIWYG editor. The user with elevated rights is not warned beforehand that they are going to edit possibly dangerous content. The payload is executed at edit time. This vulnerability has been patched in XWiki 15.10RC1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceXWiki Platform contains a vulnerability where an attacker without script/programming rights can embed malicious payloads in wiki content via the WYSIWYG editor. When a user with elevated rights edits this content, the payload executes without any warning about potentially dangerous code. This is a social-engineered stored XSS/remote code execution vector exploiting the lack of content sanitization and user consent before executing privileged edits.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 15.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify XWiki versionCheck the installed XWiki version by accessing the administration panel (XWiki Administration > Info) or by looking at the xwiki-platform-core pom.xml file if you have access to the source. Alternatively, check the version displayed on the wiki homepage footer or in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version is 15.9 or earlier.
-
Verify WYSIWYG editor is enabledAccess XWiki administration: go to Administration > Editing > WYSIWYG Editor. Check if the WYSIWYG editor is enabled for the wiki. This can also be verified by checking the xwiki.cfg configuration file for the ' WYSIWYGEditor' or 'editor' configuration keys.Affected if The WYSIWYG editor is enabled and available to users.
-
Check for users without script or programming rightsNavigate to Administration > Users > User Directory. Review the list of users and their assigned rights. Look for users who do not have 'Script' or 'Programming' rights but have the ability to create or edit wiki content.Affected if There are users without script/programming rights who can create or edit content that could be edited by users with elevated rights.
-
Confirm elevated-rights users existNavigate to Administration > Users > Groups. Identify users who have elevated privileges such as 'Admin', 'Script', or 'Programming' rights, as these are the targets whose editing would trigger the malicious payload.Affected if Users with elevated rights (Admin, Script, Programming) exist who could edit content created by lower-privilege users.
A user is affected if they run XWiki version 15.9 or earlier with the WYSIWYG editor enabled and have a mix of low-privilege content creators and elevated-rights editors in their environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade XWiki to version 15.10RC1 or later. Until patched, warn elevated-rights users to avoid editing content from untrusted sources and consider disabling the WYSIWYG editor for content that may be authored by lower-privilege users.
XWiki 15.10RC1 or later (15.10.x series recommended)
- Ensure you have a backup of your current XWiki installation and database
- Download XWiki 15.10RC1 or a later stable version (15.10.x or newer) from the official XWiki downloads
- Follow the standard XWiki upgrade procedure: stop the current XWiki instance, replace the WAR file and libraries, update configuration files if needed, and restart the server
- Verify the upgrade was successful by logging in and testing wiki functionality
- Confirm the vulnerability is patched by testing that users without script/programming rights can no longer inject payloads that execute when elevated users edit content in the WYSIWYG editor
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43401 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43401 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data