CVE-2024-43435
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in moodle. Insufficient capability checks make it possible for users with access to restore glossaries in courses to restore them into the global site glossary.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Moodle's glossary restore functionality. Insufficient capability checks allow users who only have permission to restore glossaries within individual courses to bypass restrictions and restore those glossaries into the global site glossary, which should require higher-level administrative permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1.12>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.9>= 4.3.0, < 4.3.6>= 4.4.0, < 4.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Moodle versionAccess Site Administration > Server > Environment page or check version.php in the Moodle root directory. Run: grep -i 'version' version.php | head -5Affected if The installed version falls within < 4.1.12, >= 4.2.0 and < 4.2.9, >= 4.3.0 and < 4.3.6, or >= 4.4.0 and < 4.4.2
-
Verify glossary module is in useNavigate to Site Administration > Plugins > Plugins overview and check if the Glossary module is installed and enabled, or check for any course-level glossariesAffected if Glossary module is enabled and users have glossary restore permissions within courses
-
Inspect glossary restore capability configurationGo to Site Administration > Users > Permissions > Define roles and review roles assigned 'moodle/restore:restore' or specific glossary-related capabilities. Check if any non-admin roles have glossary restore permissionsAffected if Users with only course-level glossary permissions can perform restore operations
-
Check for global site glossary accessibilityNavigate to the site-level glossary (typically at /mod/glossary/view.php?id=1 or through Site Administration > Plugins > Modles > Glossary > Common glossary settings) and test whether users without admin privileges can restore glossaries to itAffected if Non-administrative users can restore glossaries into the global/site-level glossary when they should only have course-level restore access
-
Review audit logs for glossary restore operationsAccess Site Administration > Reports > Logs and filter for 'glossary' and 'restore' events to identify any restore operations to site-level glossaries performed by non-admin usersAffected if Restore events to the global glossary were performed by users lacking the moodle/glossary:managecategory capability
You are affected if your Moodle version is within the affected ranges AND users with only course-level glossary permissions can restore glossaries into the global site glossary.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.124.2.94.3.6
Apply the vendor patch which adds proper capability verification checks before allowing glossary restoration to the global site glossary, ensuring only users with global glossary permissions can restore to the site-level glossary.
Upgrade to the latest fixed version: 4.4.2 (or 4.3.6, 4.2.9, or 4.1.12 depending on your branch)
- 1. Back up the Moodle database and the moodledata directory before any upgrade.
- 2. Download the appropriate fixed version of Moodle from moodle.org/downloads (e.g., 4.1.12, 4.2.9, 4.3.6, or 4.4.2).
- 3. Place the site into maintenance mode via Site administration > Server > Maintenance mode.
- 4. Replace the existing Moodle installation files with the new version files, preserving config.php and any custom code in local/ or theme/ directories.
- 5. Run the upgrade by accessing the site via web browser or CLI: php admin/cli/upgrade.php
- 6. Confirm the upgrade completed successfully and the site is operational.
- 7. Verify that the capability checks are now properly enforced for glossary restoration.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43435 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43435 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data