CVE-2024-43477
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in Decentralized Identity Services resulted in a vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker to disable Verifiable ID's on another tenant.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an improper access control vulnerability in Decentralized Identity Services where the system fails to properly validate tenant boundaries. An unauthenticated (unauthenticated) attacker can make requests that should require authentication and proper tenant context, allowing them to disable Verifiable IDs belonging to users in different tenant contexts. This represents a tenant isolation failure in the authorization logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Verifiable Credentials feature is enabledIn Microsoft Entra admin center, navigate to Identity > Verifiable Credentials and check if the feature is provisioned or active in your tenant.Affected if Verifiable Credentials is enabled and actively used in the tenant, exposing the tenant to this authorization bypass vulnerability.
-
Review Azure AD sign-in logs for disable operationsAccess Microsoft Entra admin center > Monitoring > Sign-in logs and filter for operations targeting Verifiable Credentials, specifically look for 'Disable' action types originating from unauthenticated or cross-tenant IP addresses.Affected if Sign-in logs show disable operations on Verifiable IDs that originated from unauthenticated requests or IP addresses not associated with legitimate tenant administrators.
-
Check Azure AD audit logs for Verifiable Credential modificationsNavigate to Microsoft Entra admin center > Monitoring > Audit logs and filter the 'Category' for 'Verifiable Credentials' or 'Identity Verification Services' to review recent credential disable events.Affected if Audit logs reveal Verifiable ID disable events that were performed without proper tenant context or authentication claims matching the target tenant.
-
Inspect conditional access policies for Verifiable Credential endpointsIn Microsoft Entra admin center > Protection > Conditional Access, examine whether policies explicitly require authentication and tenant context for Verifiable Credential management APIs.Affected if No conditional access policies are configured to enforce tenant-specific authentication on Verifiable ID management endpoints, indicating the tenant boundary was not enforced.
Your environment is affected if Verifiable Credentials are enabled in your Entra ID tenant and audit logs show unauthorized cross-tenant disable operations or lack of tenant context enforcement on credential management endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication enforcement and tenant context validation on all Verifiable ID management endpoints to ensure users can only modify IDs within their own tenant. Add explicit tenant authorization checks before any disable/modify operations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43477 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43477 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data