CVE-2024-43728
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into form fields, which persists in the system. When users browse to pages containing these compromised fields, the malicious scripts execute in their browsers, potentially stealing session cookies, credentials, or performing actions on behalf of the victim.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.22.0< 2024.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed AEM versionNavigate to AEM Welcome page or check the crx/packmgr/service.jsp endpoint to identify the exact version number. Typically found at 'http://[host]:[port]/aem/start.html' or via the 'Version' column in Package Manager.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.21 or earlier, or falls below 2024.11.0 (for the 2024 release track).
-
Verify form authoring is enabledCheck if forms functionality is active by reviewing the AEM Forms UI at /aem/forms or by examining the presence of form-related content fragments or adaptive forms in the repository under /content/forms.Affected if Forms or adaptive forms are created and publicly accessible, as the XSS payload injects into form fields.
-
Inspect form data storage for suspicious contentQuery the AEM repository (CRXDE Lite at /crx/de) or examine form submission data under /content/forms/af or similar paths for any unexpected script tags, javascript: URIs, or HTML event handlers.Affected if Any form field data contains persisted <script> tags, event handlers (onerror, onload, onclick), or javascript: pseudo-protocol entries.
-
Review recent form submissions or content updatesCheck the AEM audit logs or content modification history via the 'Timeline' view in AEM Assets or via the Replication queue to identify recent form-related content authored by unexpected users.Affected if Form submissions originate from untrusted sources or contain encoded payloads that may represent attempted XSS injection.
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.22.0 or 2024.11.0 AND you have forms enabled with user-submitted content that could contain malicious scripts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.22.02024.11.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.22 or later. Additionally, implement robust input validation and output encoding on form fields as a defense-in-depth measure while the patch is being applied.
AEM 6.5.22.0 (for 6.5.x line) or AEM 2024.11.0 (for newer release line)
- 1. Identify the current AEM version in use (6.5.x line or 2024.x cloud/newer release line)
- 2. If running AEM 6.5.x version 6.5.21 or earlier, schedule upgrade to version 6.5.22.0 or later
- 3. If running AEM 2024.x version before 2024.11.0, schedule upgrade to version 2024.11.0 or later
- 4. After upgrade, verify that the XSS fix is applied by testing form field inputs with malicious script payloads
- 5. Review Adobe's release notes for any additional security fixes included in the target release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43728 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43728 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data