CVE-2024-43751
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into vulnerable form fields, which executes in victim browsers when they view the affected page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.22.0< 2024.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AEM versionAccess the AEM Welcome page or run 'java -jar cq-quickstart*.jar -version' from the installation directory. Alternatively, check the version in the 'crx-quickstart/package.xml' file or via the system console at /system/console/bundles (look for Adobe Experience Manager bundle version).Affected if The installed version is 6.5.21 or earlier, or any version below 2024.11.0 (for example, 6.5.0 through 6.5.21, or 2024.x versions below 2024.11.0).
-
Confirm AEM Forms module is in useCheck if the AEM Forms add-on is installed by navigating to /libs/fd/fm/view/ or checking the 'AEM Forms' tile on the AEM Welcome page. Look for form components under /libs/foundation/components/form/ in CRX/DE Lite (accessible at /crx/de/index.jsp).Affected if AEM Forms module is installed and forms are being used on the publish or author instances.
-
Inspect form configurations for missing output encodingNavigate to the form component definitions in CRX/DE Lite under /apps or /libs. Check the JSP or HTL files (for example, in /libs/foundation/components/form/text, /libs/fd/fm/components) for whether they use context-aware encoding (such as 'out.escapeHtml()' in JSP or '${resource.properties @ context='html'}' in HTL) when rendering form field values.Affected if Form field values are rendered without proper context-aware output encoding, allowing unsanitized user input to be stored and displayed.
-
Scan stored form data for malicious scriptsUse CRX/DE Lite (at /crx/query.jsp) or the Query Builder API to search form submission nodes (typically under /content/forms/af or custom form content paths) for patterns like '<script', 'javascript:', 'onerror=', 'onload=', or other XSS vectors in stored field values.Affected if Form submission data contains unsanitized HTML or JavaScript payloads that were successfully stored in the repository.
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.22.0 or below 2024.11.0, AND you are using AEM Forms with form fields that accept user input without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.22.02024.11.0
Apply the vendor patch (upgrade to AEM 6.5.22 or later) and sanitize existing form data to remove any injected malicious scripts.
6.5.22.0 (for 6.5.x LTS branch)
- Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version by checking the AEM About page or version.properties file
- Determine your release track: 6.5.x (LTS) or 2024.x (Cloud Service/Continuous Delivery)
- Review Adobe Experience Manager release notes for the target fixed version
- Create a full backup of the AEM instance including repository, configurations, and any custom code
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Follow Adobe's official upgrade documentation for your specific version path
- After completing the upgrade, verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing form fields with malicious script payloads
- Clear AEM caches and rebuild search indexes if necessary
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-43751 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-43751 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data