CVE-2024-4395
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe XPC service within the audit functionality of Jamf Compliance Editor before version 1.3.1 on macOS can lead to local privilege escalation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe XPC service in Jamf Compliance Editor's audit functionality contains a vulnerability that allows a local attacker to escalate privileges. XPC services in macOS handle inter-process communication, and improper validation or authorization in this service can be exploited to gain higher-level system access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Jamf Compliance Editor is installedCheck for the presence of Jamf Compliance Editor application in /Applications or via system_profiler SPApplicationsDirectoryAffected if The application is found on the system
-
Determine installed versionRight-click the application in /Applications, select Get Info, or use 'mdls' command to read the version attributeAffected if Version displayed is below 1.3.1 (e.g., 1.3.0, 1.2.x, or earlier)
-
Confirm audit functionality statusOpen Jamf Compliance Editor and navigate to the audit settings panel to see if audit logging or compliance auditing is enabledAffected if Audit functionality is configured or actively running
-
Check for XPC service activityUse 'launchctl list | grep -i jamf' or inspect the application's bundle contents for XPC service components within the app wrapperAffected if XPC service components related to audit are present and loaded
A user is affected if Jamf Compliance Editor version 1.3.0 or earlier is installed and the audit functionality XPC service is accessible on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Jamf Compliance Editor to version 1.3.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
Jamf Compliance Editor 1.3.1
- Identify the current version of Jamf Compliance Editor installed on the macOS system
- Navigate to the official Jamf website or trusted Jamf distribution channel to download Jamf Compliance Editor version 1.3.1 or later
- Install the updated version of Jamf Compliance Editor following standard Jamf installation procedures for macOS
- Verify the installation was successful by confirming the new version number in the application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4395 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4395 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data