CVE-2024-4404
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe ElementsKit PRO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.6.2 via the 'render_raw' function. This can allow authenticated attackers, with contributor-level permissions and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ElementsKit PRO WordPress plugin contains an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the render_raw function. Attackers with contributor-level or higher permissions can make arbitrary web requests from the server, potentially accessing internal services and exfiltrating sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.6.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ElementsKit PRO is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for the elementskit folder, or access WordPress admin > Plugins to list installed plugins. Identify if ElementsKit PRO (or Wpmet Elementskit) appears in the plugin list.Affected if The plugin is not found in the installed plugins list, then the environment is not affected by this specific vulnerability.
-
Identify the installed version of ElementsKit PROIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > ElementsKit PRO. The version number is displayed below the plugin name. Alternatively, check the main plugin file (elementskit/elementskit.php) for the 'Version' header in the plugin comments.Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 3.6.3 (e.g., 3.6.2, 3.6.1, 3.5.0, etc.), indicating the vulnerable version is present.
-
Verify contributor or higher user roles existIn WordPress admin, navigate to Users > All Users. Review the role assigned to each user account. Identify whether any accounts have the Contributor, Author, Editor, or Administrator role.Affected if At least one user account with Contributor-level or higher permissions exists in the WordPress installation, which satisfies the authentication requirement for exploiting this SSRF flaw.
-
Confirm the render_raw function is accessibleLocate the render_raw function in the ElementsKit PRO codebase, typically found in the elementskit directory under includes or helpers. Check if the function processes user-supplied URLs without proper validation (requires code review or vulnerability scan of the specific file containing render_raw).Affected if The render_raw function accepts URL parameters and performs server-side requests without validating the destination, allowing the SSRF to be exploited.
The environment is affected if ElementsKit PRO version is below 3.6.3 AND contributor-level or higher user accounts exist, enabling an authenticated attacker to exploit the render_raw function for SSRF.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.6.3
Upgrade ElementsKit PRO to a version beyond 3.6.2 that contains the patched render_raw function with proper request validation and access controls.
3.6.3
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate ElementsKit PRO in the plugin list
- Check if an update is available for ElementsKit PRO
- If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to update to version 3.6.3
- Alternatively, download ElementsKit PRO version 3.6.3 from the official source (wpmet.com) and upload it via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- After updating, verify the current version is 3.6.3 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4404 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4404 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data