CVE-2024-44055
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in brandexponents Oshine Modules oshine-modules.This issue affects Oshine Modules: from n/a through < 3.3.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Oshine Modules WordPress plugin allows attackers to make the server perform unintended requests to internal or external resources due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs or endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Oshine Modules plugin installationCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'oshine-modules' or similar variant. If using WP-CLI, run: wp plugin list --search='oshine'Affected if The plugin folder does not exist (not affected) or exists (potentially affected)
-
Identify installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin file (e.g., index.php or oshine-modules.php) in the plugin folder and locate the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block, or check the readme.txt file for the 'Stable tag' entryAffected if Version number is missing or cannot be determined (requires manual review)
-
Compare version against vulnerable rangeCompare the identified version number to the fixed version 3.3.8. Versions prior to 3.3.8 are vulnerableAffected if Installed version is lower than 3.3.8 (e.g., 3.3.7, 3.3.6, etc.)
-
Identify active modules using URL parametersIn the WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Oshine Modules settings or check the theme/customizer configuration where Oshine modules are enabled. Look for modules that accept URL/endpoint inputs such as custom layout modules, content fetch modules, or any module making server-side requestsAffected if Any Oshine module that accepts user-supplied URLs is active and the plugin version is below 3.3.8
If Oshine Modules plugin is installed with a version lower than 3.3.8 AND a module accepting URLs is in use, the environment is affected by this SSRF vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Oshine Modules to version 3.3.8 or later. If an update is unavailable, disable the plugin until a patch is released.
3.3.8
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find the 'Oshine Modules' plugin in the list
- Check if the current version is below 3.3.8
- If update available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to version 3.3.8
- Alternatively, go to Dashboard > Updates and select Oshine Modules to update
- After update, verify the new version number reflects 3.3.8 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,952.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-44055 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-44055 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data