CVE-2024-44093
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn ppmp_unprotect_buf of drm/code/drm_fw.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a kernel vulnerability in the DRM (Direct Rendering Manager) subsystem's firmware code. The ppmp_unprotect_buf function in drm/code/drm_fw.c contains a logic error that causes memory corruption, which can be exploited for local privilege escalation without requiring any additional privileges or user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the target system is Google AndroidRun 'getprop ro.build.fingerprint' or 'cat /proc/version' to identify the OS. On Android, the fingerprint typically contains 'android' or the version string shows 'Linux' with Android markers.Affected if The system is NOT running Google Android - this CVE only affects Android devices.
-
Verify the kernel includes DRM firmware supportCheck if the kernel has DRM (Direct Rendering Manager) firmware code loaded. Look for modules containing 'drm' or 'fw' in /proc/modules, or check /sys/module/ for drm-related modules. Also check if /sys/class/drm/ exists.Affected if The system lacks DRM subsystem support - the vulnerability exists in DRM firmware code (drm/code/drm_fw.c).
-
Check for the vulnerable ppmp_unprotect_buf function presenceInspect the kernel image or loaded modules for the ppmp_unprotect_buf symbol. Use 'grep -r ppmp_unprotect_buf /lib/modules/' or 'nm /proc/kcore 2>/dev/null | grep ppmp_unprotect_buf' if accessible. Alternatively, check if drm.ko or gpu-related kernel modules are loaded via 'lsmod'.Affected if The ppmp_unprotect_buf function is present in the loaded kernel or modules - this function contains the logic error causing memory corruption.
-
Identify if GPU firmware loading is activeCheck if processes or services are using DRM for graphics rendering. Look at /dev/dri/ or /dev/graphics/* devices, and check running processes that access GPU firmware. Use 'ls -la /dev/dri/' and check for active graphics drivers.Affected if DRM firmware loading is actively in use - the vulnerability triggers when ppmp_unprotect_buf processes buffer protection during firmware operations.
If the system is Google Android with DRM subsystem and the ppmp_unprotect_buf function is present, the environment is affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability; since all Android versions are affected per the advisory, any Android device meeting these conditions is vulnerable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied kernel patch that corrects the logic error in ppmp_unprotect_buf. This is a kernel-level fix requiring system update or patch deployment.
Android Security Patch Level September 2024 or later (UP1A.231105.001 for Pixel devices)
- 1. Check the current Android Security Patch Level on the device in Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level
- 2. Apply the latest Android security update available for your device from your device manufacturer or carrier
- 3. For Pixel devices, ensure Android 14 (build number UP1A.231105.001 or later) or the latest available update is installed
- 4. Verify the Security Patch Level has been updated to September 2024 or later after applying the update
- 5. If no update is available from your device manufacturer, consider upgrading to a device that receives regular security updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,736.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-44093 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-44093 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data