CVE-2024-44225
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.2 and iPadOS 18.2, iPadOS 17.7.3, macOS Sequoia 15.2, macOS Sonoma 14.7.2, macOS Ventura 13.7.2, tvOS 18.2, watchOS 11.2. An app may be able to gain elevated privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA logic flaw in Apple operating systems allowed a malicious application to bypass security checks and elevate its privileges beyond what should be permitted for its sandbox or permission level. This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability affecting iOS, iPadOS, macOS, tvOS, and watchOS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 17.7.3>= 18.0, < 18.2>= 18.0, < 18.2>= 13.0, < 13.7.2>= 14.0, < 14.7.2>= 15.0, < 15.2< 18.2< 11.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your Apple device and operating systemDetermine whether the device runs iOS (iPhone), iPadOS (iPad), macOS (Mac computer), tvOS (Apple TV), or watchOS (Apple Watch). On iOS/iPadOS, go to Settings > General > About. On macOS, go to Apple menu > About This Mac. On tvOS, go to Settings > General > About. On watchOS, use the Watch app on a paired iPhone under My Watch > General > About.Affected if N/A - this step identifies the platform to select the correct version check
-
Check the installed iOS or iPadOS versionOn iPhone or iPad, open Settings > General > About and note the Version number (for example, 18.1 or 17.7.2).Affected if The version is less than 17.7.3, OR is 18.0 or higher but less than 18.2 (for example, 18.0, 18.1)
-
Check the installed macOS versionOn Mac, click the Apple menu and select About This Mac. Note the version number (for example, 14.1 or 15.1).Affected if The version is 13.0 or higher but less than 13.7.2, OR 14.0 or higher but less than 14.7.2, OR 15.0 or higher but less than 15.2
-
Check the installed tvOS versionOn Apple TV, go to Settings > General > About and note the tvOS version number.Affected if The version is any version lower than 18.2 (for example, 18.0, 18.1, or earlier)
-
Check the installed watchOS versionOpen the Watch app on a paired iPhone, tap My Watch > General > About, and note the watchOS version number.Affected if The version is any version lower than 11.2 (for example, 11.0, 11.1, or earlier)
Your device is affected if the installed operating system version falls within any of the vulnerable ranges listed for your platform.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.213.7.214.7.2
Apply the relevant security update (iOS 18.2/iPadOS 18.2/17.7.3, macOS Sequoia 15.2/Sonoma 14.7.2/Ventura 13.7.2, tvOS 18.2, or watchOS 11.2) to all affected devices to address the logic issue and restore proper privilege boundaries.
iPadOS 17.7.3, iPadOS 18.2, iOS 18.2, macOS Ventura 13.7.2, macOS Sonoma 14.7.2, macOS Sequoia 15.2, tvOS 18.2, or watchOS 11.2 depending on current OS version
- Identify the current installed OS version on the device
- For iPadOS devices: If running iPadOS 17.x, upgrade to iPadOS 17.7.3 or later; if running iPadOS 18.x, upgrade to iPadOS 18.2
- For iPhone devices: If running iOS 18.x, upgrade to iOS 18.2
- For macOS Ventura (13.x) devices: Upgrade to macOS Ventura 13.7.2 or later
- For macOS Sonoma (14.x) devices: Upgrade to macOS Sonoma 14.7.2 or later
- For macOS Sequoia (15.x) devices: Upgrade to macOS Sequoia 15.2 or later
- For tvOS devices: Upgrade to tvOS 18.2 or later
- For watchOS devices: Upgrade to watchOS 11.2 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-44225 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-44225 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data