CVE-2024-4447
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the System → Maintenance tool, the Logged Users tab surfaces sessionId data for all users via the Direct Web Remoting API (UserSessionAjax.getSessionList.dwr) calls. While this is information that would and should be available to admins who possess "Sign In As" powers, admins who otherwise lack this privilege would still be able to utilize the session IDs to imitate other users. While this is a very small attack vector that requires very high permissions to execute, its danger lies principally in obfuscating attribution; all Sign In As operations are attributed appropriately in the log files, and a malicious administrator could use this information to render their dealings untraceable — including those admins who have not been granted this ability — such as by using a session ID to generate an API token. Fixed in: 24.07.12 / 23.01.20 LTS / 23.10.24v13 LTS / 24.04.24v5 LTS This was the original found by researcher Zakaria Agharghar. 2. Later, on October 20, 2025, another researcher (Chris O’Neill) found additional affected DWR Endpoints that are vulnerable to Information Disclosure, namely and in addition to the original found of "UserSessionAjax.getSessionList.dwr - Session ID exposure": * UserAjax.getUsersList.dwr - Enumerate all users with IDs, names, emails * RoleAjax.getUserRole.dwr - Get user role information * RoleAjax.getRole.dwr - Get role details * RoleAjax.getRolePermissions.dwr - View role permissions * RoleAjax.isPermissionableInheriting.dwr - Check permission inheritance * RoleAjax.getCurrentCascadePermissionsJobs.dwr - View permission cascade jobs * ThreadMonitorTool.getThreads.dwr - Monitor system threads; and, * CRITICAL - Privilege Escalation: RoleAjax.saveRolePermission.dwr - Modify role permissions Overall CVSS for the above findings: * CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L * Score: 9.1 (Critical)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple Direct Web Remoting (DWR) API endpoints in the System Maintenance tool expose sensitive information due to insufficient authorization checks. The original finding (UserSessionAjax.getSessionList.dwr) exposes session IDs allowing privilege escalation, while subsequent findings reveal additional endpoints exposing user data, roles, permissions, and a critical privilege escalation vector through RoleAjax.saveRolePermission.dwr.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify System Maintenance tool is deployedCheck for the presence of the System Maintenance module in your application. This is typically found in the web application's admin or maintenance section. Search for files or URLs containing 'SystemMaintenance' or 'systemMaintenance'.Affected if The System Maintenance tool is installed and accessible in your environment.
-
Confirm DWR endpoints are accessibleTest if DWR (Direct Web Remoting) is enabled by attempting to access common DWR endpoints such as /dwr/*.dwr or checking if the DWR servlet is mapped in your web.xml configuration.Affected if DWR is enabled and the servlet is accessible without authentication.
-
Check UserSessionAjax.getSessionList.dwr accessibilityAttempt an unauthenticated or low-privilege HTTP request to the endpoint UserSessionAjax.getSessionList.dwr. This can be done via curl or browser developer tools: GET /path/to/dwr/call/UserSessionAjax.getSessionList.dwrAffected if The endpoint returns session IDs or sensitive session data without requiring elevated privileges.
-
Check RoleAjax.saveRolePermission.dwr accessibilityAttempt an unauthenticated or low-privilege HTTP POST request to RoleAjax.saveRolePermission.dwr endpoint to determine if authorization is enforced: POST /path/to/dwr/call/RoleAjax.saveRolePermission.dwrAffected if The endpoint allows role or permission modifications without proper authorization checks.
-
Identify other sensitive DWR endpointsReview all DWR endpoints under the System Maintenance tool for endpoints that expose user data, roles, or permissions. Common patterns include RoleAjax, UserAjax, PermissionAjax, or SessionAjax in the endpoint names.Affected if Additional DWR endpoints return sensitive user information, roles, or permissions without proper access control.
Your environment is affected if the System Maintenance tool with DWR endpoints is accessible and these specific endpoints (UserSessionAjax.getSessionList.dwr, RoleAjax.saveRolePermission.dwr, or similar) return sensitive data or allow privileged actions without proper authorization enforcement.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement role-based authorization checks on all DWR endpoints to enforce proper access control, ensuring users can only access data and perform actions within their assigned permissions.
24.07.12 (or 23.10.24v13 LTS / 23.01.20 LTS for LTS branches)
- 1. Identify the current dotCMS version by checking the admin panel or dotmarketing.xml configuration file
- 2. Determine which upgrade path is appropriate: if on 24.x, upgrade to 24.07.12 or later; if on 23.x LTS, upgrade to 23.01.20 LTS or 23.10.24v13 LTS; if on 24.04.x, upgrade to 24.04.24v5 LTS or later
- 3. Take a complete backup of the database and dotCMS configuration files before upgrading
- 4. Follow the official dotCMS upgrade documentation for your specific version jump
- 5. After upgrade, verify the fix by attempting to access the vulnerable DWR endpoints (UserSessionAjax.getSessionList.dwr, UserAjax.getUsersList.dwr, RoleAjax.*, ThreadMonitorTool.getThreads.dwr) with a low-privilege admin account that should NOT have access
- 6. Confirm that unauthorized admin accounts can no longer enumerate users, view roles/permissions, or modify role permissions via these DWR endpoints
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4447 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4447 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data