CVE-2024-44678
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGigastone TR1 Travel Router R101 v1.0.2 is vulnerable to Command Injection. This allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by sending a crafted HTTP request to the ssid parameter in the request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Gigastone TR1 Travel Router R101 v1.0.2 contains a command injection vulnerability in the ssid parameter of HTTP requests. An authenticated attacker can execute arbitrary operating system commands by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to the affected endpoint.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is Gigastone TR1 Travel Router R101Access the device's web administration interface and navigate to the status or system information page to identify the exact model name and number.Affected if The device is a Gigastone TR1 Travel Router R101
-
Check firmware version is 1.0.2In the device's web interface, look for a firmware version, system version, or software version field typically found under Settings, System, or Status pages.Affected if The installed firmware version is 1.0.2
-
Verify web interface is accessibleConfirm you can reach the device's HTTP administration page (typically on ports 80 or 443) and that you have valid administrator credentials to log in.Affected if The device's web interface is accessible and authentication is possible
-
Identify ssid parameter in HTTP requestsUse a web proxy or browser developer tools to intercept HTTP requests when accessing wireless settings. Look for any HTTP POST or GET requests containing an 'ssid' parameter that could be manipulated.Affected if The device processes ssid parameters through its web interface without proper sanitization
The user is affected if they are running Gigastone TR1 Travel Router R101 with firmware version 1.0.2 and the device's web interface with ssid parameter handling is accessible and enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched firmware version if available. If unavailable, restrict administrative access to the device's web interface to trusted IP addresses or networks to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-44678 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-44678 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data