CVE-2024-44756
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNUS-M9 ERP Management Software v3.0.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the usercode parameter at /UserWH/checkLogin.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in NUS-M9 ERP Management Software v3.0.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the usercode parameter at the /UserWH/checkLogin endpoint, potentially enabling unauthorized access to the database and application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NUS-M9 ERP installationLook for the application on the system - check web server directories, installed programs, or documentation listing this ERP system. Search for files or services referencing 'NUS-M9', 'Nus M9', 'Nuserp', or 'M9 ERP'.Affected if The software is not installed or is a different product
-
Verify the exact version is 3.0.0Check the application's version information - typically found in about pages, system info, version files, or the web interface footer. Compare against the affected version = 3.0.0.Affected if Version is not exactly 3.0.0 or cannot be determined
-
Confirm the /UserWH/checkLogin endpoint existsCheck the web application's URL structure - access or probe the endpoint at /UserWH/checkLogin (note the capitalization). This is the vulnerable login handler path.Affected if The endpoint does not exist or returns 404
-
Check if dynamic SQL is used in login handlerInspect the application source code or backend configuration for the login handler at checkLogin - look for string concatenation or direct query building using the usercode parameter rather than parameterized queries.Affected if The application uses parameterized queries or prepared statements (not vulnerable)
-
Test usercode parameter for SQL injectionIf authorized and in a test environment, send a benign SQL injection test payload (like a single quote) to the usercode parameter at /UserWH/checkLogin and observe for SQL errors or unexpected behavior.Affected if The parameter is not sanitized and returns SQL syntax errors or executes injected queries
The environment is affected only if NUS-M9 ERP version 3.0.0 is installed AND the /UserWH/checkLogin endpoint uses dynamic SQL with the usercode parameter without proper input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the login handler, apply input validation on the usercode parameter, and restrict database account privileges to the minimum required.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-44756 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-44756 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data