Aspera FaspexApplication · Ibm

CVE-2024-45097

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-09-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.0.10 or later.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.9 could allow a user to bypass intended access restrictions and conduct resource modification.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Aspera Faspex versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.9 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to circumvent intended access restrictions and modify resources they should not have permission to alter. The specific access control mechanism bypassed is not detailed in the advisory.

MitigationUpgrade IBM Aspera Faspex to version 5.0.10 or later to remediate this authorization bypass vulnerability. Review user access permissions and audit recent activity for signs of unauthorized resource modification.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Aspera FaspexApplication
Affected:>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM Aspera Faspex version
    Locate the Faspex application version through the web interface (typically displayed in the About or System Information section) or check the installation directory for version metadata files
    Affected if The installed version is 5.0.0 through 5.0.9 (versions prior to 5.0.10)
  2. Confirm Faspex web interface is accessible
    Verify the Aspera Faspex web interface or API endpoint is reachable and operational
    Affected if The Faspex service is running and accepts user authentication connections
  3. Verify user authentication is enabled
    Check that the Faspex authentication system is active and users can log in to the application
    Affected if User authentication is enabled and functional, allowing authenticated users to access the system
  4. Review access control configuration
    Examine the Faspex user roles and permission settings to understand current authorization controls
    Affected if Role-based access controls are configured and users have varying permission levels
  5. Audit recent user activity logs
    Review Faspex audit logs for any unusual resource modification events that may indicate exploitation of the authorization bypass
    Affected if Suspicious or unauthorized modification attempts are observed in the logs

A user is affected if their installed IBM Aspera Faspex version falls between 5.0.0 and 5.0.9 and the application accepts authenticated user connections.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.0.10 or later
Fixed in 5.0.10
Interim mitigation

Upgrade IBM Aspera Faspex to version 5.0.10 or later to remediate this authorization bypass vulnerability. Review user access permissions and audit recent activity for signs of unauthorized resource modification.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Aspera Faspex 5.0.10

  1. Verify current installed version of Aspera Faspex using the admin console or command line
  2. Backup current Aspera Faspex configuration and data according to IBM documentation
  3. Download Aspera Faspex version 5.0.10 from IBM Fix Central or authorized distribution channels
  4. Follow IBM's standard upgrade procedure for Aspera Faspex 5.0.x releases
  5. After upgrade, verify the installation was successful and test that access controls are functioning correctly
Caveat Review IBM release notes for 5.0.10 for any version-specific migration notes or deprecated features

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Aspera Faspex Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45097 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45097 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data