CVE-2024-45512
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in webmail in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) through 10.1. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by creating a folder in the Briefcase module with a malicious payload and sharing it with a victim. When the victim interacts with the folder share notification, the malicious script executes in their browser. This stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability can lead to unauthorized actions within the victim's session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) webmail's Briefcase module through version 10.1. An authenticated attacker can create a folder with a malicious script payload in the Briefcase and share it with a victim. When the victim interacts with the share notification, the stored JavaScript executes in their browser context, potentially allowing session hijacking or unauthorized actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.0.0>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.9= 9.0.0= 10.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ZCS versionCheck the installed Zimbra Collaboration Suite version using thezmcontrol command (zmcontrol -v) or by examining the ZCS package installed on the serverAffected if The installed version is < 9.0.0, = 9.0.0, >= 10.0.0 and < 10.0.9, or = 10.1.0
-
Verify Briefcase module is enabledConfirm the Briefcase feature is active for user accounts by checking the ZCS administrative console or looking for Briefcase-related configuration in the server settingsAffected if Briefcase module is enabled and accessible to users
-
Inspect Briefcase folders for suspicious namesReview existing Briefcase folder names for any that contain HTML or script tags, unusual encoding, or unexpected characters. Access this via the webmail interface or by querying the ZCS database for folder entries in the BriefcaseAffected if Any folder name contains raw HTML tags, JavaScript event handlers, or encoded script payloads
-
Review share notifications for XSS vectorsExamine share notification records in the ZCS database or mail queue for any that contain unsanitized folder names or unexpected script content in notification messagesAffected if Share notifications contain unescaped HTML or JavaScript in folder share metadata
You are affected if your ZCS version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND the Briefcase module is enabled, particularly if any Briefcase folders have been shared with notifications containing unsanitized content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.010.0.9
Implement server-side input validation and output encoding for folder names in the Briefcase module, particularly in share notification rendering. Consider Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution. Apply any vendor-supplied patches for ZCS 10.1.
ZCS 10.0.9+ or 10.1.1+ (or latest 9.0.x patch for 9.x installations)
- 1. Identify the current Zimbra Collaboration Suite version by running: zmcontrol -v or checking the admin console
- 2. For ZCS 10.0.x installations: Upgrade to version 10.0.9 or later which contains the security fix for this vulnerability
- 3. For ZCS 10.1.0 installations: Upgrade to version 10.1.1 or later
- 4. For ZCS 9.0.0 installations: Upgrade to version 9.0.1 or the latest 9.0.x patch
- 5. For any ZCS versions < 9.0.0: Plan migration to a supported version (9.0.1+ or 10.0.9+/10.1.1+)
- 6. After upgrade, verify the Briefcase module functionality works correctly and the XSS fix is applied
- 7. Review admin audit logs to check for any prior exploitation attempts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45512 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45512 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data