CVE-2024-4555
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Privilege Management vulnerability in OpenText NetIQ Access Manager allows user account impersonation in specific scenario. This issue affects NetIQ Access Manager before 5.0.4.1 and before 5.1
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in NetIQ Access Manager that allows user account impersonation in a specific, undisclosed scenario. The flaw enables an authenticated attacker to potentially assume the identity of other users by exploiting how the product handles privilege verification. This could lead to unauthorized access to resources protected by the Access Manager.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.0.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetIQ Access Manager versionLocate the installed version of NetIQ Access Manager using the product's administration console, version info in the installation directory, or package management system. Compare this version against the affected range.Affected if The installed version is lower than 5.0.4.1 (for example, 5.0.4.0, 5.0.3.x, 5.0.2.x, or earlier releases)
-
Confirm the authentication component is activeVerify that the NetIQ Access Manager authentication and session management services are running and that the product is actively handling user authentication requests.Affected if The Access Manager authentication services are enabled and processing user logins
-
Inspect for anomalous impersonation activityReview authentication logs, audit trails, and session records for unexpected user identity changes, privilege verification bypass attempts, or sessions where the authenticated user differs from the session initiator.Affected if Logs contain unexplained user identity switches or privilege verification inconsistencies that were not initiated by administrators
-
Check for unauthorized resource accessExamine access logs for protected resources to identify any instances where users accessed resources or performed actions inconsistent with their assigned roles or permissions.Affected if Evidence exists of users gaining access to resources outside their normal privileges or impersonating other user accounts
The environment is affected if NetIQ Access Manager version is below 5.0.4.1 and the authentication component with privilege verification is actively handling user sessions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.0.4.1
Upgrade to NetIQ Access Manager version 5.0.4.1 or 5.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Prior to upgrade, if supported, implement additional authentication controls and monitor for anomalous impersonation attempts.
NetIQ Access Manager 5.0.4.1 or later, or 5.1 or later
- Verify current NetIQ Access Manager version by checking the administration console or using the version command
- Review the upgrade guide at the official Micro Focus support documentation for Access Manager
- Create a complete backup of the current Access Manager configuration and database
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Download NetIQ Access Manager 5.0.4.1 or later (or 5.1 or later) from the Micro Focus support portal
- Follow the standard upgrade procedure: stop all Access Manager services, run the upgrade installer, verify the installation, then restart services
- After upgrade, verify the version number matches the expected fixed release
- Test user authentication and privilege assignment to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4555 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4555 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data