CVE-2024-45587
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability exists in Symphony XTS Web Trading platform version 2.0.0.1_P160 due to improper access controls on APIs in the Transaction module of vulnerable application. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameters through HTTP request which could lead to compromise of other user accounts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the Symphony XTS Web Trading platform's Transaction module. An authenticated attacker can manipulate HTTP request parameters to access or modify other users' transaction data, indicating broken access control enforcement on the affected APIs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.0.1= 2.0.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the installed version of Symphony XTS platformCheck the application version in the system settings, about page, or installed packages. For web deployments, check the application metadata or configuration files.Affected if The installed version is 2.0.0.1 for either Xts Mobile Trader or Xts Web Trader.
-
Confirm the Transaction module is accessibleIdentify if the Transaction module API endpoints are exposed in the deployment. Check API documentation or network traces for requests to transaction-related endpoints.Affected if The Transaction module API is enabled and accessible to authenticated users.
-
Inspect authorization logic on Transaction API endpointsReview the backend code or API gateway configuration for the Transaction module. Verify if user context is validated against the requested resource owner on each endpoint.Affected if The Transaction module APIs do not verify that the authenticated user owns or has permission to access the requested transaction data.
-
Test for parameter manipulation vulnerabilityUsing an authenticated session, capture a Transaction API request and modify the transaction identifier or user reference parameters to point to a different user's data. Observe if unauthorized access is granted.Affected if Manipulating transaction parameters allows access to other users' transaction records.
A user is affected if they are running version 2.0.0.1 of Symphonyfintech Xts Mobile Trader or Web Trader with the Transaction module enabled and lacking proper authorization controls on its APIs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all Transaction module API endpoints to validate that the authenticated user has permission to access the specific resource. Use indirect object references and enforce principle of least privilege.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45587 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45587 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data