CVE-2024-45657
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Security Verify Access Appliance and Container 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 could allow a local privileged user to perform unauthorized actions due to incorrect permissions assignment.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Security Verify Access versions 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 contains incorrect permissions assignment that allows a local privileged user to perform unauthorized actions. This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability where the permissions on certain files, directories, or system resources are improperly set, enabling an authenticated user with elevated privileges to exceed their intended authorization boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0.0, < 10.0.9.0>= 10.0.0.0, < 10.0.9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed IBM Security Verify Access versionRun the command to display the product version, typically via 'isva_version' or check the appliance management interface for the version numberAffected if The installed version is 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.8.x (versions below 10.0.9.0)
-
Verify if running IBM Security Verify Access Docker containerRun 'docker ps' or check for docker container processes running ibm/security-verify-access imagesAffected if The Docker container image version is below 10.0.9.0
-
Identify sensitive file system locationsLocate the installation directory where IBM Security Verify Access is installed, commonly under /opt/ibm or /var directory depending on deployment methodAffected if Files or directories related to Verify Access are present and accessible
-
Review file and directory permissions on installationUse 'ls -la' or 'getfacl' commands to inspect permissions on key directories such as configuration, bin, and runtime directories within the installation pathAffected if Any configuration, binary, or runtime directories have overly permissive settings (such as world-writable or group-writable permissions) that allow unauthorized modification by lower-privileged users
A system is affected if it runs IBM Security Verify Access version 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.8.x (or Docker image of those versions) and has misconfigured file system permissions on installation directories or configuration files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.9.0
Apply the appropriate IBM Security Verify Access patch or upgrade to version 10.0.9 or later. Review and correct file system permissions on the appliance according to IBM's hardening guidelines.
Upgrade to IBM Security Verify Access version 10.0.9.0
- 1. Review IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.9.0 release notes and upgrade documentation for any prerequisites or migration requirements.
- 2. Create a complete backup of the current IBM Security Verify Access configuration and data.
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window to perform the upgrade with minimal service disruption.
- 4. Upgrade IBM Security Verify Access Appliance or Container from version 10.0.0-10.0.8 to version 10.0.9.0.
- 5. After upgrade, verify that the incorrect permissions vulnerability is resolved by reviewing the fix details in the 10.0.9.0 release notes.
- 6. Validate that all expected functionality and services are running correctly post-upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45657 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45657 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data