CVE-2024-45658
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Security Verify Access Appliance and Container 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned. This information could be used in further attacks against the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Security Verify Access Appliance and Container versions 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 return detailed technical error messages to users, which can expose sensitive system information such as stack traces, file paths, configuration details, or internal logic. A remote attacker can trigger these verbose errors and collect the leaked information to plan further attacks against the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0, <= 10.0.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed versionCheck the IBM Security Verify Access version using the product's built-in version command, admin console, or system information interface. Common methods include running 'iverify -version', accessing /opt/ibm/verify/version, or checking the admin dashboard under System Information or About sections.Affected if The installed version is 10.0.0, 10.0.1, 10.0.2, 10.0.3, 10.0.4, 10.0.5, 10.0.6, 10.0.7, or 10.0.8.
-
Trigger a test error conditionIntentionally submit invalid input or access a non-existent resource through the web interface or API to force an error response. This can include malformed requests, invalid credentials, or accessing undefined endpoints.Affected if The error response contains stack traces, file paths, internal logic details, or configuration information rather than a generic message.
-
Examine HTTP error responsesCapture and review HTTP responses from the application when errors occur. Look at response bodies for technical details such as Java/Python stack traces, absolute file paths, environment variables, or framework-specific error pages.Affected if Responses include technical debugging information visible to remote users.
-
Check custom error handling configurationReview the product's error handling or response configuration settings. Look for custom error page definitions, error suppression settings, or middleware configurations that control what gets displayed to users.Affected if No custom error handling is configured and the product is using default error pages that expose technical details.
You are affected if your installed version falls within 10.0.0 to 10.0.8 and your application returns detailed technical information (stack traces, file paths, or internal logic) in error responses to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM Security Verify Access to a version beyond 10.0.8, or implement custom error handling to suppress detailed technical messages and return generic error responses to users in production environments.
10.0.9 or later
- Upgrade IBM Security Verify Access to a version beyond 10.0.8 (such as 10.0.9 or later) to remediate the information disclosure vulnerability.
- After upgrade, verify that detailed technical error messages are no longer returned to users.
- Test that the application functions normally after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45658 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45658 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data