CVE-2024-4604
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedURL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in Magarsus Consultancy SSO (Single Sign On) allows Manipulating Hidden Fields. This issue affects SSO (Single Sign On): from 1.0 before 1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an open redirect vulnerability in Magarsus Consultancy SSO where attackers can manipulate hidden fields to redirect users to malicious sites after authentication. The vulnerability exists in version 1.0 and is fixed in version 1.1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Magarsus Consultancy SSO versionCheck the application version by reviewing the software documentation, a /about page, version info in the footer, or the application configuration files (typically in the installation directory or admin panel).Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or earlier, since version 1.1 contains the fix.
-
Locate authentication-related source filesSearch the web application directory for files handling the login or authentication process, particularly looking for code that processes redirect parameters or hidden form fields after successful authentication.Affected if The application contains authentication handling code that processes redirect URLs from client-supplied hidden fields.
-
Inspect redirect parameter handlingReview the authentication flow to identify where the application handles post-login redirection. Look for code that reads and applies values from hidden form fields or URL parameters to determine the post-authentication destination.Affected if The code accepts and uses a redirect parameter from hidden fields without strict domain validation.
-
Check redirect URL validation logicExamine the validation logic applied to redirect URLs before they are used. Determine whether there is strict allowlist validation restricting redirects to trusted domains only.Affected if No strict domain allowlist validation exists, or the validation can be bypassed by manipulating hidden field values.
A user is affected if Magarsus Consultancy SSO version 1.0 is installed and the post-authentication redirect feature processes URLs from hidden fields without strict domain validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Magarsus Consultancy SSO version 1.1 or later. Additionally, implement strict validation of redirect URLs to ensure they only point to whitelisted domains.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4604 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4604 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data