Incorrect Default PermissionsWeakness · CWE-276

CVE-2024-46467

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
83/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
By default, dedicated folders of ZONEPOINT for Windows up to 2024.1 can be accessed by other users to misuse technical files and make them perform tasks with higher privileges. Configuration of ZONEPOINT has to be modified to prevent this vulnerability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

ZONEPOINT for Windows up to version 2024.1 ships with default folder permissions that allow other users on the same system to access technical files in dedicated folders. This insecure configuration can be exploited to make the application perform privileged tasks, resulting in privilege escalation.

MitigationModify ZONEPOINT configuration to restrict folder access permissions according to vendor security guidance, ensuring dedicated folders are only accessible to authorized users and service accounts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify ZONEPOINT installation and version
    Check for ZONEPOINT in the list of installed programs (via Registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall or Programs and Features) and note the installed version.
    Affected if ZONEPOINT is installed and the version is 2024.1 or earlier.
  2. Locate ZONEPOINT application folders
    Identify the installation directory (commonly C:\Program Files\ZONEPOINT or C:\Program Files (x86)\ZONEPOINT) and look for dedicated subfolders that store technical files, configuration, or data.
    Affected if The application directory contains dedicated folders with technical files accessible to the system.
  3. Inspect folder permissions on dedicated folders
    Right-click on each dedicated folder, open Properties, go to the Security tab, and review which users and groups have permissions. Check for grants to "Users", "Authenticated Users", or other non-administrative groups with Modify or Full Control access.
    Affected if Any dedicated folder grants read, write, or modify permissions to unprivileged users or groups such as "Users" or "Authenticated Users".
  4. Check for sensitive technical files accessible to other users
    Within the dedicated folders, enumerate files (e.g., configuration files, scripts, data files, logs) and verify their accessibility to unprivileged accounts by checking file ownership and effective permissions.
    Affected if Sensitive or technical files are present in folders with overly permissive access controls, allowing manipulation by unprivileged users.

If ZONEPOINT version 2024.1 or earlier is installed and its dedicated folders grant access to unprivileged users, the environment is affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Modify ZONEPOINT configuration to restrict folder access permissions according to vendor security guidance, ensuring dedicated folders are only accessible to authorized users and service accounts.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-46467 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-46467 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data