CVE-2024-46627
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect access control in BECN DATAGERRY v2.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted web requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIncorrect access control in BECN DATAGERRY v2.2 allows attackers to bypass authentication/authorization mechanisms and execute arbitrary operating system commands through specially crafted web requests. The vulnerability stems from missing or insufficient permission checks on specific API endpoints that handle system operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify DATAGERRY installationLook for DATAGERRY running as a web service. Check for processes named 'datagerry' or listening on common web ports (80, 443, 8000). Inspect running services on the system.Affected if DATAGERRY is found running as a service on the system
-
Determine installed versionCheck the installed DATAGERRY version. This may be visible in the web interface footer, in application logs, in a config file, or via an API endpoint like /api/version. Compare against v2.2.Affected if The installed version is v2.2 or falls within the affected version range based on the summary
-
Verify web interface exposureDetermine if the DATAGERRY web interface is network-accessible. Check firewall rules, reverse proxy configuration, or bind addresses in DATAGERRY config to see if the interface is exposed to untrusted networks.Affected if The DATAGERRY web interface is accessible from untrusted network segments
-
Inspect access control configurationReview DATAGERRY's role-based access control (RBAC) settings and API endpoint permissions. Check configuration files or the admin panel for public/unrestricted endpoints.Affected if API endpoints lack proper authorization controls or allow unauthenticated access
A system is affected if DATAGERRY v2.2 is running with its web interface network-accessible and has misconfigured access controls that allow unauthorized command execution requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately restrict network access to DATAGERRY instances, implement proper authentication and role-based authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints, validate and sanitize all user inputs, and apply vendor patches as soon as available.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-46627 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-46627 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data