CVE-2024-47119
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0.0 through 2.0.9 does not properly validate a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the host and client.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Storage Defender Resiliency Service versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.9 fails to properly validate SSL/TLS certificates, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof trusted entities by intercepting and tampering with the communication path between host and client.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0, <= 2.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if IBM Storage Defender Resiliency Service is installedLocate the installation directory or check system inventory for the product named 'IBM Storage Defender Resiliency Service' or 'Resiliency Service'Affected if The product is present on the system
-
Determine the installed versionUse the product's version lookup mechanism (such as running 'version' command from the installation directory, checking the About dialog, or reviewing installation logs) and compare the version number to the affected range 2.0.0 through 2.0.9Affected if The version is 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.0.5, 2.0.6, 2.0.7, 2.0.8, or 2.0.9
-
Verify if the service is configured for network communicationReview the service configuration files or network settings to determine if SSL/TLS client or server connections are enabledAffected if Network communication with SSL/TLS is configured and active
-
Confirm SSL/TLS validation is in useInspect the SSL/TLS configuration settings or connection logs to verify that certificate validation is intended but ineffective due to the vulnerabilityAffected if Certificate validation is expected but the version falls within the vulnerable range
You are affected if IBM Storage Defender Resiliency Service version 2.0.0 through 2.0.9 is installed and the service uses SSL/TLS network communication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to IBM Storage Defender Resiliency Service version 2.1.0 or later which contains the proper certificate validation fix. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement strict certificate pinning or network segmentation as compensating controls.
Upgrade to a version newer than 2.0.9 (e.g., 2.0.10 or later if available). Check IBM's official security bulletin for the exact fixed release version.
- 1. Identify the current installed version of IBM Storage Defender Resiliency Service by checking the product documentation or system inventory.
- 2. Review IBM's official security bulletin for CVE-2024-47119 at www.ibm.com to confirm the specific fixed version and any prerequisites.
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade, ensuring backups of current configuration are available.
- 4. Download the fixed version of Storage Defender Resiliency Service from IBM Fix Central or the IBM Container Registry.
- 5. Follow IBM's standard upgrade procedure for Storage Defender Resiliency Service, including pre-upgrade checks and post-upgrade validation.
- 6. After upgrading, verify that the certificate validation vulnerability is resolved and that the service starts successfully.
- 7. Test critical workflows to ensure the upgrade did not introduce any regressions.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47119 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47119 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data